Subscription

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Mission Impossible?

 


Friends, this week's Newsmaker Show explores what everyone agrees is November's top story: the "contested election" and the prospects for overturning it.  Brian and I explore the strengths and weaknesses of the President's case and his legal team, as well as the importance of maintaining public support, especially Republican support, for Trump.  I reflect on how little loyalty the Republican establishment has to the President, however, which will make prevailing in the current situation extremely difficult.  In addition, Brian and I talk about globalism, and why the globalists were always bitter enemies of Trump.


In our "This Day in History" segment, Brian and I explore the long odds of victory in the American Revolutionary War, the ideological relationship between Kennedy and Johnson, the likelihood of a U.S. pullout from South Vietnam had Kennedy survived in office, and the sad fate of Native Americans on the frontier at the end of the 19th century.


Don't miss a single second!


https://wlea.net/newsmaker-november-25-2020-dr-nick-waddy/

6 comments:

  1. Like that photo of JFK. Of all our Presidents he is one of the best fornicators and serial adulterers who has ever been in the office. Makes all other presidents look like paragons of virtue.

    Speaking of globalism, one of the best books around on that subject is "The New World Order" by Pat Robertson. Yes, I know, Robertson has been dismissed as a religious nut case by many, which he is not, but this book is well worth reading. It was published on the eve of The ClintONISTA regime, but is still relevant to today's situation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, Ray. It's true -- JFK was a paragon of paramours!

    Thanks for the book recommendation. The globalists will be pleased that Trump is in distress, but they should reflect on the fact that 73 million Americans voted for AMERICA FIRST, and we aren't going anywhere!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dr.Waddy et al: Your comments on the progress of the election are well argued; I cannot constructively add anything this time. It is fascinating to speculate on how the '64 election could have gone. Had the GOP nominated Rockefeller, he could have given JFK a real run. The country wasn't ready for a principled and committed conservative national candidate andthe conservative movement was too new. I think Goldwater was chosen because by then Johnson appeared too strong to beat. Wonder if Johnson would have stayed on board; he chafed at having to deal with all them Ivy League swells.



    ReplyDelete
  4. So many possibilities, Jack! You know far more about it than I do. What about Nixon? He sidelined himself in '64, I assume partly because he thought it was a lost cause. Speaking of which, you really think Goldwater didn't have a prayer? How was it that he got wiped out?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dr.Waddy fromJack: As I remember it: in the popular media of the time, Goldwater was unknown. Nixon had no chance in '64, none. Everyone would have scoffed at the notion that he would ever rise from
    his '62 humiliation. It took time but not really a long time for him to recover and his rise was astonishing! What political acumen and gutsy determination that demonstrated. Especially,when for awhile, it looked like he would face another Kennedy swell in the election. He was a helluva a man! I remember Goldwater being viewed as a curiosity. He had no chance! The country was not ready for frank conservative expression. I know at the time I thought it a little "weird ". It took four years of Johnsonian dreaminess to begin to raise caution flags. But in '64, LBJ was very mainstream and Goldwater was fringe.
    Ad

    P

    ReplyDelete
  6. Huh. If that's so, Jack, then how did Goldwater get the nomination in the first place?

    ReplyDelete