Friday, June 19, 2020
The Nexus of American Insanity
Friends, there can be little doubt that much of America is going bonkers. The idea that our country is fundamentally racist, that the Trump administration is fundamentally fascist, that capitalism is fundamentally oppressive and unfair, that criminals are victims and police are thugs, and that COVID-19 is the most horrifying and chilling threat to public health in history, or even at the moment -- these are notions that only a diseased or a highly deluded mind could sustain. And yet...here we are.
I recommend this article to you, which argues convincingly that, at the root of many of these delusions lies academia. Peter Wood suggests that, far from defunding the police, we ought to be defunding ivory tower Marxists. Of course, that will never happen on an institutional basis, but if we conservatives can find alternatives to the leftist indoctrination provided in most "liberal arts" colleges, surely our country would be better off. He suggests that we stop donating to our alma maters, if those institutions have long ago stopped respecting our values. Hear hear! He suggests that we encourage our children and grandchildren to find alternative sources of learning and to eschew higher ed, as much as they are able. Why not? He suggests that, to the extent that conservatives hold sway over higher ed budgets, especially at the state level, we should consider cutting off funds to institutions that persecute patriots, Christians, police, white people, men, or anyone inclined to dispute the accuracy of academia's crypto-Marxist orthodoxy. I agree.
As a professor myself, I realize that the tough times that lie ahead for higher education may negatively impact me. So be it. Mr. Wood is right that the cancer of leftism that is spread, first and foremost, by "educators" is the greatest single threat to the future of America, of our democracy, and of our civilization. We need not accept left-wing profs as a force of nature, nor must we cede academia to the Left for all time. In the long run, either we must wrest control of academia back and put it in responsible hands, or we must knock down the current edifice of higher ed and start over. It may take decades, or it may take centuries, but the future of mankind is at stake, and therefore we dare not shrink from the challenge.
https://spectator.us/defund-colleges-not-cops/#
Wednesday, June 17, 2020
"Sex": It Ain't What It Used To Be
Friends, while the media concentrates on the really important issues -- like putting all policemen in jail, and giving all gangsters free puppies and a skeleton key to the city -- a quiet revolution has taken place in how our society views "sex" and gender. You know what I'm talking about. It's been painfully obvious for a while that leftists no longer believe in the male-female dichotomy that has undergirded Western and non-Western conceptions of sex and gender for millennia. Well, that's not quite true: they still believe that women are good, and men are bad, but otherwise they like to suggest that sex and gender are way more complicated than just...boys and girls.
We've known that liberals feel this way, but it came as something of a shock to learn that the Supreme Court has drunk the Kool-Aid as well. What's more, they recently transposed this very modern take on sex and gender onto the Civil Rights Act of 1964, mandating federal protection for gays and transgenders in the workplace. Quite literally, liberals and "woke" Justices have turned our understanding of "sex" on its head, and the world will never be the same.
That's the subject of my latest article. The implications for society and for gender relations are troubling enough, but I concentrate on the implications for the Constitution and the rule of law.
See if you agree with my slant on things...
The LGBT Community's Win is
America's Loss
Recently, the
Supreme Court decided that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which
prohibits employment discrimination based on “sex”, also
prohibits discrimination based on a person's sexual orientation or
status as transgender. Two nominally conservative Justices, Roberts
and Gorsuch, joined the Court's liberals in expanding federal
protections for the LGBT community. Even Justice Kavanaugh, who voted
in opposition to the ruling, effectively apologized for doing so and
congratulated gay and transgender Americans for their historic
“victory”.
While reasonable
people can disagree about whether it is appropriate or necessary for
federal law to prohibit such workplace discrimination, especially
when in many cases local and state laws, not to mention corporate
policies and procedures, already do so, the fact is that the Supreme
Court's ruling perpetuates a disturbing trend: it does violence to
the law itself and to the principle of the rule of law, by twisting
the original and clear meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
The framers of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were unambiguous: they criminalized
discrimination based on “sex”. A person's sex was understood at
the time to be biologically determined and would fall into one of
only two categories: male or female. In the mid 60s, attitudes
towards homosexuality and towards “transvestites” and
“cross-dressers”, as they were widely called at the time, were
almost uniformly hostile. These may be considered “identities”
now, but in the 1960s they were considered criminal acts and/or clear
signs of mental instability. Thus, no one in Congress would have
proposed legal protections for homosexuals or transgender persons,
and, if they had, such legislation would not have passed.
These are facts.
One can like them or dislike them, but one can't will them out of
existence.
The Supreme
Court's recent reinvention of the meaning of the Civil Rights Act
therefore relies on the doctrine that the original wording of the
bill, and the intent of the lawmakers who passed it, doesn't matter.
What matters is the uses that contemporary society wishes to make of
a law adopted 56 years ago, and contemporary society, and especially
its political, cultural, and economic elite, is virtually unanimous
in viewing discrimination against gays and transgender people as
obscene.
Therefore,
since it would be nice if the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had
abolished discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and/or
transgender status, the Supreme Court made the decision to pretend
that it did. “Sex” now means, well, whatever we want it to mean,
and in this case we want it to mean that gay and transgender
Americans will receive the same protections in the workplace as women
do. Case closed.
(To
the objection that the Supreme Court merely broadened
the concept of “sex”, I would reply that anyone who is fired for
having sex in the office break room, or for having sex with his
boss's wife, will quickly find that the broad-mindedness of federal
judges has distinct limits.)
The bigger problem here is that, if no law or Constitutional
provision has a fixed, static meaning, then every aspect of our legal
and Constitutional system operates at the sole discretion of
black-robed social justice warriors (for that is what most judges
have become). We can expect that the law and the Constitution will be
used time and time again to advance a “progressive” agenda, which
the American people may or may not be ready to embrace, and which
their elected legislators have declined to advance themselves.
This
is a trend that began as early as the 1950s, when the Supreme Court
mandated the desegregation of public schools nationwide, based
primarily on the re-purposing of the 14th
Amendment. Those efforts gathered steam in the 1960s and 70s, when a
whole host of political and social reforms were pioneered by activist
judges. Now, with the Supreme Court's endorsement of gay marriage in
2015, and its recent prohibition of employment discrimination against
gays and transgender Americans, the beat goes on.
The widespread celebration of the LGBT community's “victory”
must therefore be tempered by a rising concern that the integrity of
our legal and Constitutional system has been forfeited on the altar
of social progress and political expediency. After all, passing
controversial legislation enshrining the rights of new groups is
hard. Conjuring those rights into being by judicial fiat is
comparatively easy. That, however, begets an entirely new and
potentially worse problem: the easier we make it for unelected judges
to revolutionize our way of life and overturn the will of the
people's representatives, the more often they will do it.
We may someday find ourselves living in an America where the views
of the voters and of the men and women in Congress are irrelevant,
and the Justices of the nation's highest court reign supreme over all
of us. In fact, that day may already be here.
In that case, we had better hope that Justices Roberts, Gorsuch, and
Kavanaugh are familiar with the saying “Absolute power corrupts
absolutely”, because self-restraint may be the only hope we have of
preventing a judicial tyranny from taking root on American soil.
Dr.
Nicholas L. Waddy is an Associate Professor of History at SUNY Alfred
and blogs at: www.waddyisright.com.
He appears weekly on the Newsmaker Show on WLEA 1480/106.9.
And here it is at American Greatness:
https://amgreatness.com/2020/06/19/the-lgbt-communitys-win-is-americas-loss/
And here it is at American Greatness:
https://amgreatness.com/2020/06/19/the-lgbt-communitys-win-is-americas-loss/
Communism Shows Its True Colors
Friends, this week's Newsmaker Show is typically exquisite in its masterful dissection of current events and sundry historical themes.
In terms of the here and now, Brian and I talk about the ongoing media assault on law enforcement, and the tragic experiment that is unfolding in Seattle, where an "autonomous zone" is embracing chaos over law and order. We also discuss the campaign of vandalism underway against any and all historical monuments that offend the far-left, and the underwhelming response by police and local leaders. To a point, violence against public property is being legitimized as a form of protest against "racism". I predict that this will only beget more violence, since the Left appears to be emboldened by its recent successes.
In our coverage of "This Day in History," Brian and I talk about the Watergate burglary...and the political uses to which it was put. We also cover the legacy of the O.J. Simpson murder trial and its implications for race relations. Finally, Brian and I talk about the brutal Soviet suppression of the abortive revolt in East Berlin in 1953, which set a precedent for the further tightening of the Soviet noose in Eastern Europe. We point out the irony that many left-wing protestors now embrace communism, when a REAL communist regime would sweep such misfits away in a heartbeat.
Tune in today!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQZ5I3izTDs&feature=youtu.be
Monday, June 15, 2020
A Supreme Disappointment
Friends, today brings us news that causes chagrin for anyone devoted to the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law. The "conservative" Supreme Court has decided, by a 6-3 vote, that gay and transgender people are protected from being fired from their jobs based on their "sex" by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Keep in mind that, in 1964, "sex" didn't have anything to do with "sexual orientation" or "gender identity". These terms either didn't exist at the time or were not in common usage. Moreover, the idea that the men and women who wrote and passed the Civil Rights Act intended to protect gays and transgender people from discrimination is absurd. Everyone knows that homosexuality was considered deviant in the mid-60s. It was usually viewed, in fact, as criminal and as mentally deranged behavior. But now, by some legalistic legerdemain, the Supreme Court has transformed the meaning of the clear language of the Civil Rights Act to produce a blanket prohibition on employment discrimination against gays and transgenders. Quite a feat! Keep in mind that, in 1964, "sex" implied two binary choices: men and women. Now, "sex" means that a person can choose between an infinite number of "sexes" or genders, and his/her/its employer must cater to all of them, even if they should happen to shift from week to week, or hour to hour. No one in 1964 could contemplate such a state of affairs, much less enshrine it in legislation...and yet here we are.
The question arises: why would a "conservative" Supreme Court do such a thing? Why would they do it, especially when most states have already prohibited the kinds of discrimination that the Court is now targeting? Why would they do it, when "institutional" and "systemic" homophilia is self-evidently more common than homophobia? The answer is simple: even "conservative" Justices live in Washington, D.C. They are part of our political-cultural-economic elite, and that elite, almost to a man (or "person", I should say) believes that gays are wonderful, and thus anyone or anything that denies them their rights and entitlements, on any basis, even Constitutional or commonsensical, is monstrous and wrong. Men like Neil Gorsuch, who voted with the majority in this case, would have to look their liberal peers in the eye if they voted "no," and the path of least resistance is therefore to go along to get along. The searing contempt, and perhaps even the violence, that would be visited upon anyone who dared to dissent from the cherished doctrine of "equality" is a huge disincentive to principled resistance, needless to say. That's probably why, even though Brett Kavanaugh voted with the minority, he effectively apologized for his vote and congratulated homosexuals and transgenders on their "vision, tenacity, and grit," as well as their "important victory," to which he was technically opposed! Remarkable.
So...we are left to ask: what is "sex" in 2020? It isn't what it was in 1964, or 1984, or even 2014. It is, quite simply, whatever liberals say it is. Doubt my judgement? Try announcing that your sex is "Trumper". See how far you get!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-gay-workers-protected-from-job-discrimination-in-big-win-for-lgbt-rights
In other news, Barbra Streisand has decided to right the wrongs of white privilege and systemic racism by giving a pile of Disney stock to a 6-year-old. Aside from the sheer wretchedness of the warped pseudo-Marxist philosophy that suggests that money is the answer to every hurt, it apparently never occurred to Barbs that she is perpetuating the "white savior" myth that many black activists and far-left types find so repulsive. But hey, Barbra Streisand is consistently repulsive, so I for one applaud her for staying true to herself. Maybe her "sex" is "yuck"? Far be it from me to discriminate.
https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/barbra-streisand-george-floyd-gianna-disney-stock-105907223.html
Friday, June 12, 2020
Good Bye, Charlotte -- Hello, Jacksonville!
Friends, Roy Cooper's grumbling and obstructionism has led the Republican National Convention to be moved from Charlotte to Jacksonville. Congrats to the great city of Jacksonville! It's one of the few big cities in America to have a Republican mayor. It's also one of the few big cities in America that doesn't regularly burst into flames courtesy of a mob. Good choice, GOP!
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/06/12/republicans_pick_jacksonville_as_alternative_convention_site_143439.html
Next, read this article about the current vogue for forcing anyone who doesn't tow the leftists' party line -- including misguided liberals -- to issue groveling apologies. Free speech AND self-respect are both incompatible with leftism, or so it appears.
https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/forced-apologies-and-public-shaming-doctrinal-deviation-sweep-american-culture
Finally, as a historian I deplore the recent vandalism directed at historic monuments. It's happening worldwide, and many in the media apparently consider it a campaign of purification. It's not. It's a campaign of childishness, intolerance, and spite. Mark my words: if we let the Left have a field day with Confederates and slave owners now, they'll be after pretty much everyone born before the year 2000 before we know it. The Left's "standard of decency", as Biden phrased it, sets the bar incredibly high. In a nutshell, you can either bow before the Marxist demon-gods 100% of the time, or you can face the consequences...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-minneapolis-police-protests-statues/knocked-off-their-perch-protesters-target-empire-builders-confederate-symbols-idUSKBN23J1QA
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
The War on Police
Friends, this week's Newsmaker Show addresses the elephant in the room: the Left's blistering assault on law enforcement. Some leftists are literally attacking the police in the streets, leading to injuries and deaths of police officers, while others are merely smearing all police as brutalizing "racists" and suggesting that we need to defund police departments or abolish them altogether. Amazing! Imagine: liberal politicians are actually insulting and condemning the very police officers who serve in their protection details...and who keep all of us safe! It boggles the mind. We can only hope that the voters see through this unthinking prejudice against law enforcement and punish those who promote it. Given the realities of media bias, however, we can't be sure that will happen. Presumably, in the short term, the effectiveness of law enforcement in our big cities will decline, and crime will rise. Welcome to blue America!
In addition to the current unrest and who and what is behind it, Brian and I talk about the state of the presidential race, including the recent polls showing President Trump at a disadvantage. I conclude that the media barrage against Trump is having some effect, but that, since Biden can't hide from public scrutiny forever, in the end the election will be close. Brian and I also discuss the extraordinary pivot that the media has made from the pandemic to its BLM obsession.
In our "This Day in History" segment, Brian and I cover Benjamin Franklin and his kite, Nelson Mandela's remarkable journey from revolutionary to peacemaker, the lessons of the Salem Witch Trials, the sad fate of General William Westmoreland in the wake of the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, President Eisenhower's strategy for winning the Cold War, as well as the roles of Norway and Italy in determining the shape and outcome of the Second World War.
So, in a nutshell, Brian and I discuss...everything under the sun, and we do it with style and grace!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y92AssQiVJo&feature=youtu.be
Tuesday, June 9, 2020
Kowtowing to the "Black Community" is All the Rage, But Why?
Friends, the image above -- a screenshot of the launch page of the Amazon website -- combines an homage to the Black Lives Matter movement with a sales pitch for shoes. Believe it or not, it isn't designed to make us retch. It's designed to position Amazon as a "woke" company that feels the pain of African-Americans. No, not the African-Americans who are killed by violent criminals or whose homes or businesses have been destroyed by recent unrest. They can feel their own pain, thank you very much. We're talking about the blacks who are killed by the police, even if the circumstances were more than a little hazy. They're the exemplars of "systemic racism" that Amazon, and now seemingly every major corporation and institution, feels they have to acknowledge. And this begs the question: why does George Floyd (and his ilk) matter, when so little else does to these companies, except making a buck?
My latest article addresses exactly this question. Check it out at Townhall:
https://townhall.com/columnists/nicholaswaddy/2020/06/09/statements-of-support-for-the-black-community-leave-one-big-question-unanswered-n2570302
While you're at it, you might also be interested in these related articles:
https://amgreatness.com/2020/06/06/racism-inc/
https://nypost.com/2020/06/08/more-than-700-officers-injured-in-george-floyd-protests-across-us/
https://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2020/06/09/the-lefts-coming-war-on-cops-n2570281
Friday, June 5, 2020
No Dialogue, Please -- We're Leftists
Friends, the liberals' rush to insanity continues apace. Now they're asking us to "defund the police", and keep in mind that they're doing this mainly in areas where Democrats and "woke" Marxist ideologues already control governments and police forces. Yikes! Maybe they think we should deputize Antifa to keep order in our cities, and put the policemen in chains? That sounds about right.
The New York Times is caving on the issue of whether, in effect, Republicans and conservatives should be listened to. Check it out:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ny-times-revolt-over-op-ed-would-crush-dissenting-views
In other news, the economy is recovering a lot faster than anyone anticipated, and the job market is falling in line. That's good news, right? No! It could help Trump win in November. Horrors! CNN, MSNBC -- more video of policemen behaving "badly", please!
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/may-2020-jobs-report
Wednesday, June 3, 2020
So What If The Russkies Beat Us To It?
Friends, this week's Newsmaker Show is Grade A analysis, as always! Of course Brian and I break down the unrest in America's cities, and I lay the blame right where it belongs: with the leftist politicians and journalists who have been whipping up reverse racism and hatred of the police for decades. So many Americans have been hoodwinked by leftist/Marxist delusions and genuinely believe that they live in an oppressive police state. Now we're reaping the whirlwind of those delusions.
In "This Day in History", Brian and I cover the marriage of the Duke of Windsor in 1937 and the sacrifices that royals have to make to fulfill their public duties; the first American spacewalk in 1965 and its connection to the first private sector human spaceflight last Saturday; the Chicoms' crackdown at Tiananmen Square in 1989 and how little it affected U.S. policy towards the PRC; and the fate of Paris in WWII.
You won't want to miss a single second!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5fI0LtxNQU&feature=youtu.be
Monday, June 1, 2020
Anarchy vs. America: It Ought To Be A Simple Choice
Friends, when the forces of anarchy run riot in America's cities, you'd think that all "responsible" voices would unite in condemning the lawlessness and calling for it to end. Not so! Many leftists are praising the rioters, and defending the unrest as a legitimate response to black America's long list of grievances (some real, and some imagined). In many cities, liberal mayors are forcing police to stand down and let the hoodlums have their fun. President Trump has been restrained so far in his response, as have many Governors, but it's time we all joined forces and said: "Enough is enough!" My latest article, though, isn't about what lies ahead. It's about how we got here, and, as you might expect, I lay much of the blame on the American Left. Read on, and see if you and I are on the same page.
Let's Be Honest: Racial Grievances
are the Lifeblood of the American Left
Politicians all
over the political spectrum are finally coming around to the
commonsensical conclusion that, regardless of how unwarranted,
scandalous, and illegal police officers' treatment of George Floyd
may have been, there is no justification for the campaign of looting
and organized violence that has been unleashed on America's cities.
Violence is rarely the solution to violence, and crime is never the
solution to crime.
We also should be
candid about the fact that the mass protests, civil disobedience, and
even the acts of arson, assault, theft, and murder we are witnessing
in cities nationwide is the product of careful cultivation by the
American Left and a complicit media.
For
years, these charlatans have been selling to people of color a
delusion of gargantuan proportions: first, the idea that America in
the early 21st
century is one of the most prejudiced and oppressive places that has
ever existed; and, second, the idea that it is progressively getting
worse.
Neither notion is
remotely true, but careful editing of news coverage, as well as
indoctrination in the schools, higher education, and in virtually all
facets of our popular culture, has convinced racial minorities (and
many whites) that racism is the defining feature of the American
experience.
Not freedom.
Not opportunity.
Racism.
The recipe is
simple: ignore all prejudice and violence that emanates from people
of color and from liberals, and trumpet all prejudice and violence
that emanates, or can plausibly be claimed to emanate, from whites
who have not knelt before the gods of progressivism.
Thus, every time
a white American is rude to a black person, or displays bias, and the
incident is caught on tape, it is, perforce, national news. If that
white person inflicts any type of violence on people of color, so
much the better — such a storyline fits the agenda of the Left and
the media to a tee. Bias and/or violence that flows from the wrong
sources, however, the Left and the media feel they have a solemn
obligation to cover up, because even to acknowledge these phenomena
would “reinforce” America's “original sin”: white racism.
The result is
predictable: people of color are bombarded with messages, from
politicians, pastors, movie stars, pop singers, sports heroes,
teachers, and news anchors, that draw their attention to white
racism, and which explain virtually all dysfunction and misfortune in
communities of color as the product of such racism, both on the
individual level and in “institutional” forms.
Moreover, as we
see in so many guises these days, the standard of evidence for
proving the presence of racism has been steadily lowered. No longer
does one need to demonstrate clear racist intent to be labeled a
racist. A mere slip of the tongue, or a failure to demonstrate
sufficient enthusiasm for the causes beloved of self-declared
“anti-racists”, is more than enough to mark one as racist trash,
destined for the dustbin of history.
Likewise,
no longer does an organization or institution have to intend
to discriminate against any group to be accused of racism — merely
failing to produce the “equality of results” that leftists desire
will suffice to prove that “implicit bias” must color the
policies and leadership of the relevant party.
Put
simply, racism is the default explanation for everything of which the
modern liberal disapproves. The burden is on each and every white
American to prove that he or she is not
racist, and only complete submission to the agenda of the Left can
accomplish this (provisionally, that is, or rather until the Left
decides to make one of its own a sacrificial lamb to social justice,
which it often does).
The
upshot of this sad state of affairs is that the Democratic Party,
which is the political embodiment of the American Left — even
though most leftists hold the moribund Dems in contempt — has
embraced with aplomb the strategy of race-baiting its way to victory.
The use of racially-based dog whistles is now de
rigueur
among Democrats, and the thought that ordinary Americans, much less
people as odious as Republicans, are entitled to the benefit of the
doubt has long since been dismissed as fanciful and naive.
And now, in our smoldering streets, in the wreckage of countless
stores, in emergency rooms where the victims of mob violence are
being patched up, and in the dingy morgues where the fatalities from
street brawls are accumulating, we see the Left's philosophy of
racial grievance taken to its ultimate conclusion.
Liberals cultivated fear, anger, and despair, because they expected
to profit from them. They did profit from them, in fact, but America
as a whole has paid, is paying, and will continue to pay a steep
price for the leftists' gravely irresponsible and short-sighted
conduct.
And the saddest part is this: we were so close to healing many of
the racial divides that now threaten to swallow us whole.
Dr.
Nicholas L. Waddy is an Associate Professor of History at SUNY Alfred
and blogs at: www.waddyisright.com.
He appears weekly on the Newsmaker Show on WLEA 1480/106.9.
And here it is at WND:
https://www.wnd.com/2020/06/racial-grievances-lifeblood-american-left/
And here it is at WND:
https://www.wnd.com/2020/06/racial-grievances-lifeblood-american-left/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









