Subscription

Thursday, August 29, 2024

Back to the Future...in Brazil!

 


Friends, the wealthiest and most populous country by far in South America, Brazil, is about to return to its dictatorial roots.  Its leftist Supreme Court is almost certain to cut off Brazilians' access to X, citing the need to suppress "disinformation".  Big deal, you say?  It is a big deal, because the use of the courts to eviscerate the opposition has progressed a good deal further in Brazil than it has here, and you can bet that our Democratic friends are taking notes!  What's more, the banning and/or destruction of Twitter/X is becoming an obsession on the Left.  Mark my words: other countries will start to pull the plug on X, and frankly I'm surprised they haven't already.  In many ways, as I've said before, the slowly developing battle over pluralism on social media is far more important than, say, who wins any given U.S. election.  That's because, if you can criminalize or otherwise make impossible the mere sharing of politically inconvenient information, you can obliterate the very foundations of democracy and freedom.  And we're distressingly close to seeing it happen.


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg41n533zno

 

In other news, a veritable "sh** ton" of polls were dropped on us today, and, collectively, they reveal a Harris-Walz "bump" that is miniscule, and a race that remains incredibly close and very competitive.  If Trump is in this strong a position even in the wake of the four-day Democratic Party self-lovefest in Chicago, I'd say he and his supporters should be feeling pretty good about their chances.


https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls

Wednesday, August 28, 2024

Kama-lama-ding-dong!

 


Friends, there's nothing quite like being a Democrat.  Being a Democrat means never having to doubt yourself.  Never having to answer uncomfortable questions.  Never having to face accountability for your misdeeds, no matter how egregious.  Most of all, it means you can pour scorn and contempt on your enemies all day long -- safe in the knowledge that every institution that exists is working tirelessly to obliterate them and exalt you!  Long story short: being a Democrat means being on the winning side, since you're quite literally on the side -- the only side -- that gets to pick winners and losers in the first place.  MUST BE NICE!!!


Alas, I'm not a Democrat, but Kamala Harris is, and, boy, is she rubbing our noses in her privileged position every chance she gets!  On this week's Newsmaker Show, Brian and I reflect on Kamala's remarkably easy time of it as the new and improved, if totally unelected, presidential nominee of the Democratic Party.  Brian and I also ponder the evolution of the neoconservatives and whether hawkish foreign policy views are now a feature of one party or the other, or possibly both.  We also ask whether Trump, if reelected, will spurn the neocons and the warmongers and make common cause with RFK, Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and other anti-establishment, anti-war types.  We consider, furthermore, Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook's about-face on collaborating with the Biden Administration on the issue of censorship, the mysterious dearth of polling in the wake of the DNC, as well as whether or not a debate between Trump and Harris will ever transpire on ABC.


What a show!  It might even give you a few reasons to cling to hope, and a little hope goes a long way, wouldn't you agree?


https://wlea.net/newsmaker-august-28-2024-dr-nick-waddy/

 

***

 

In other news, Kam-Kam is set to break her streak of self-isolation and sit down and talk with CNN tomorrow night.  Wow!  Color me shocked.  A Democrat who actually feels obliged to answer questions???  What will we see next in this crazy race, huh?  Personally, I don't expect CNN to push Harris very hard, and nor do I expect her to fall flat on her face.  Frankly, I don't know why it took her this long to throw the Fourth Estate a bone...

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3d72dxe5zo 

Monday, August 26, 2024

Full Circle

 


Friends, former Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard completed (almost) her political transformation today by endorsing Donald Trump.  The only conservative milestone she hasn't yet reached is joining the GOP.  In a way, though, it's just as well if she doesn't, because right now DJT is starting to look like the "unity candidate", i.e. the guy who can appeal to centrists, which doesn't appear to be a high priority for Karmala Marx-ala.  I say: bravo, Tulsi!  I sincerely hope that Trump will make much of RFK, Jr.'s support as well as Tulsi's.  They're both incredibly accomplished and well-spoken and would make wonderful surrogates, not to mention future advisers/cabinet officials.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ex-democrat-tulsi-gabbard-endorses-trump-at-national-guard-event/ar-AA1pt1jV

Sunday, August 25, 2024

Democracy For Me, But Not For Thee

 


Friends, that prince among men, that latter-day Karl Marx (the highest compliment I can bestow!), Cornel West, has been denied access to the presidential ballot in the state of Pennsylvania.  It was a "Republican" judge who made the decision, but don't be fooled: this act has the fingerprints of the Deep State all over it.  Surely, in a democracy, no matter how kooky a candidate may be, it should be relatively easy to get him on the ballot, no?  And it should be relatively easy for voters to vote for him, too.  I mean, that's what democracy is all about: giving people choices and letting them make those choices as they see fit.  Of course, it's exactly this feature of democracy -- the democratic part -- that Democrats find so irksome.  My advice: enjoy democratic pluralism while it lasts, because at this rate it won't be long.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/presidential/3133707/court-rules-cornel-west-cant-be-on-ballot-pennsylvania/

 

In other news, the Secret Service has wasted in no time in terminating (pun intended!) RFK, Jr.'s protection detail, now that he's suspended his campaign.  Note that suspending a campaign doesn't definitively end it, and in any case Kennedy is still very much in danger, given his public profile and given the blistering contempt that half the country (at least) feels for him.  I believe it's outrageous, albeit entirely in character, for the Secret Service to make this decision.  As for Trump, I continue to advise him to supplement his security whenever he can privately -- especially if and when he wins the election.  I suspect he'll be in very grave danger between November and January, because that would be the Deep State's last opporunity to dodge the metaphorical bullet of a Trump presidency.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/25/secret-service-ends-protection-robert-f-kennedy-jr/ 


Finally, the global establishment really, really hates social media apps that make it hard for them to deplatform and silence those they don't like.  Witness the recent arrest of the Telegram CEO in France.  Make no mistake -- Elon Musk may be the richest man alive, but he and his beloved X are by no means safe.  Can you imagine a world in which both DJT and Elon are behind bars?  I can!


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp8ne8r1yy0o

Friday, August 23, 2024

Unity Ticket

 


Friends, it's happening!!!  DJT and RFK, Jr. are joining forces.  This is a most intriguing development.  For most of the campaign, Trump did better in a five-way race than he did in a two-way race, but that was against ole Sleepy Joe.  Against Kamala, it's become increasingly apparent that the candidacy of RFK, Jr. is a potential stumbling block.  Just recently, Kennedy apparently offered to throw his support behind Harris.  She and her campaign gave him the finger, as is their wont as Democrats.  Trump embraced him.  And that may be the difference in this race, if we're to be honest.  Of course, it remains to be seen whether all of RFK's supporters will move to Trump, but this development certainly has to be alarming for Team Blue.  My view has always been that it would have been relatively easy for the Dems to neutralize Kennedy, just by treating him with minimal respect.  Well, minimal respect isn't their style, and now they can learn to live with the consequences!


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy5ekxlwzgo

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

Who Am I, and What Am I Doing Here?

 


Friends, you'll want to tune in to this week's Newsmaker Show, because Brian and I peel away all those layers of obfuscation and reveal where things ACTUALLY stand in the race for the presidency.  For example, RFK, Jr.'s declining support has him contemplating an alliance with, and an endorsement of, Donald Trump.  Could it happen?  Would it, in fact, boost Trump's chances?  All will be revealed!  In addition, Brian and I discuss the decline in fertility and parenthood in the light of women's prioritization of career over family, the issue of election integrity in 2024, the lengths to which Democrats might go to prevent DJT from winning (or serving) a second term, the abject humiliation of Joe Biden at the Democratic National Convention, the chances that the Democrats will be able to sustain artificial enthusiasm for Kamala Harris and avoid media scrutiny indefinitely, and the possible return of campus protests in the Fall.


When we turn to This Day in History, we recall the frightening days of the anti-Gorbachev coup of August 1991, and I point out that no one should ever root for instability in the leadership of a nuclear superpower like Russia, regardless of how much we may hate the man at the top, Vladimir Putin.

 

It's a doozy of a show, and I should know, since I'm a doozy of a guy!


https://wlea.net/newsmaker-august-21-2024-dr-nick-waddy/

 

***

 

Here's an analysis of Kennedy's current impact on the race for the White House, especially in the key states:

 

https://x.com/rcpolitics/status/1826326969207980492?s=46&t=-_2GpG8wfUWSVFbOLEmVNQ 


If you read between the lines here, it sure looks like Kennedy's campaign might soon be over, and Trump will be the one to win his backing (if not necessarily all of his voters).


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy7370nxz9o

Sunday, August 18, 2024

She Who Can Do No Wrong

 


Friends, there remains an air of artificiality surrounding the (newly-minted) campaign for president of Kamala Harris, but that hasn't prevented it from gaining traction with voters.  Two new polls today indicate that she is narrowly ahead in the national race.  That frankly doesn't surprise me, since she's gotten nothing but love from the mainstream media, and she's avoided almost all scrutiny.  That can't continue, but for now it's having an effect.  Trump and the GOP are playing catch-up.


https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-harris

 

Apologies for the delay, but today I can finally give you the link for this week's Newsmaker Show.  It may be out of date in some respects, but by and large my wisdom is timeless, so you should still be blessed by the opportunity to listen to my ambrosial argumentation.

 

https://rumble.com/v5bf4g4-newsmaker-august-14-2024-dr-nick-waddy.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawEvbaJleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHX27AsMbHCQmJ0S9O5-3hgM5BaH9yXV4xlwKLBvEvYpM_XlSCQWmO_7ngA_aem_MRNNpTJTu5TGeQAxmKEhvQ 


Chicago is gearing up for the Democratic National Convention, and it sure is nice to see that the Dems have been won over, at long last, to the efficacy of walls.  Of course, I jest.  They've always believed in protective barriers when it's a question of protecting them.  They just don't like walls when something as trivial as your safety and well-being is at issue.


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/18/chicago-begins-erecting-miles-security-fencing-ahead-democrat-convention/

 

Finally, the new Labour government in the U.K. is targeting "misogyny" as a major threat to public order and a "harmful and hateful" belief system.  That's all well and good, but what does the British government believe that misogyny...is?  We know they're hazy on what women are, and one assumes that their views on misogyny are equally arcane and self-serving.  Bottom line: shouldn't governments be concerned with preventing criminal acts, not subversive thoughts?  Just sayin'...


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o

Thursday, August 15, 2024

Ukraine's Ominous New "Kursk Salient"

 


Friends, way back in 1943 the biggest tank battle of all time was fought in the Kursk region of Russia, as the Soviets defeated the Germans and solidified the Allies' increasingly irresistible momentum in WWII.  Now, as we speak, the Ukrainians have advanced 30-35 kilometers into the Kursk region in a bold move designed to put their Russian adversaries on their back foot (or feet, as the case may be).  It's working, too: Russia has been flummoxed by the lightning offensive.  This puts the West in a bind.  We've told our Ukrainian clients all along that they can defend their homeland all they like, but they shouldn't escalate the war by attacking deep into Russia -- and they certainly shouldn't use our weapons and training and intel and money to do it.  Well, so much for those caveats!  Time and again, the West has said "To heck with prudence!" and allowed the Ukrainians to cross Russia's red lines.  How will this story end?  Will the Russians gird themselves and neutralize the offensive, using only conventional means?  That's very possible.  Will the Russians reply instead with some form of escalation of their own -- up to and including the use of nuclear weapons?  That's possible too, especially if the Ukrainian spearhead continues to plunge deeper into Mother Russia.  Will any of this change the ultimate outcome of the war?  Your guess is as good as mine...  One thing is for sure: the Russian military has proven itself to be far less capable than most of us assumed before hostilities commenced.  Putin and his generals ought to be ashamed of their country's palpable weakness, and one assumes they're hard at work trying to correct it.


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cql365ld002o

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9qgwvjj9d1o 


In other news, we will definitely get a rhetorical clash between J.D. Vance and Tim Walz -- that is to say, there's a Vice-Presidential debate a-brewin'!  Good.  That should be fun to watch.


https://apnews.com/article/vice-presidential-debate-walz-vance-60650c0480e132342880c35a1d29f539

 

And, in a development of potentially decisive importance in November, the appeal of third party candidates seems to be waning, and RFK, Jr., in particular, seems to be questioning the wisdom of continuing with his presidential campaign.  As someone who has thought seriously about voting for Kennedy, I find his dithering quite off-putting.  I mean, can he really be surprised by the fact that he's not likely to be the next president?  If he had a definite and substantial reason for running for president in the first place, then what's changed to make him willing to trade a measly government job for his presidential ambitions?  Be all this as it may, I think the Dems are pretty dumb to frisk aside his entreaties.  In my view, Biden could have neutralized Kennedy long, long ago, simply by treating him with a little respect.  Now, Kamala could win Kennedy's endorsement, and settle a schism on the Left, simply by promising RFK, Jr. a minor position in her administration (which she might or might not give him, in the final analysis).  Why not bite the bullet?  If I were Trump, by contrast, I would probably be willing to make common cause with Kennedy, although it frankly isn't clear whether Kennedy's endorsement of Trump, or the continuation of his campaign, with a special emphasis on attracting the votes of progressives and young people, would be more helpful to Trump's chances.  If you want my opinion, words of support from RFK, Jr. aren't likely to be worth a great deal.  People would see a Kennedy endorsement as a cynical move -- which it would be.  Dividing up the electoral pie by keeping as many viable third party candidates in the race as possible, on the other hand, has real appeal for a candidate like Trump, who isn't liked by most voters, and who thus isn't likely to win 50% of the vote.  Kennedy is looking increasingly like the embodiment of ambivalence, rather like Ross Perot back in 1992, but that doesn't mean he still can't have a crucial impact on the outcome.  Sad to say, but so many of the dynamics of this race, and in many ways the determinants of the fate of our nation, come down to personal vanity and ego -- of Trump, of Biden, of Harris, and of Kennedy.  What a farce democracy can turn out to be at times.  Oy vey!


https://www.semafor.com/article/08/13/2024/third-parties-were-having-a-moment-then-kamala-harris-showed-up

 

https://news.yahoo.com/news/rfk-jr-reached-harris-campaign-012142563.html 

Monday, August 12, 2024

Life Finds a Way

 


Friends, one of the most basic and fundamental questions humans have ever asked is: "Are we alone?"  That is, is man, homo sapiens, the only intelligent form of life in the galaxy, or is our stellar neighborhood crowded with life, even thinking beings?  We are a little closer to the answer today, because scientists believe they have found evidence of liquid water on Mars.  We've known for a while that ice exists there, and liquid water once flowed on the surface, but the presence of liquid water on (or rather underneath) Mars nowadays means it is therefore extremely possible, even likely, that organic life can be found there and studied.  This means, in turn, that the appearance and evolution of life on Earth is not a flash in the pan -- it's a reasonably common phenomenon, galactically speaking.  After all, if not one but two planets in our solar system play host to life, then, well, life just ain't that special, and beings that can compose symphonies and split atoms probably aren't either.  Now, whether we will ever bump into intelligent life beyond Earth is another matter -- that may be difficult, given the vast distances involved -- but we may soon be in a position to answer, for all time, that searching question: "Are we alone?"  No, we are not!


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czxl849j77ko

 

In other news of intergalatic importance, Donald Trump will appear on X tonight, and he will be interviewed by none other than Elon Musk.  It will be fascinating to see how these two one-time rivals will interact, and whether they will manage to form a lasting and profitable (to mankind) partnership.

 

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-returns-x-first-time-dropping-infamous-2023-mugshot-elon-musks-platform 


Finally, check out my most recent article, which explores the millions of dollars federal, state, and local governments are pouring into giant hosptial systems.  "But everyone loves health care!" you may be thinking...  Well, sure, but there are fiscal limits, after all, and we are butting up against them!


https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.crainsnewyork.com/op-ed/op-ed-we-cant-put-our-fiscal-house-order-without-tackling-high-cost-health-care

Thursday, August 8, 2024

It's On Like Donkey Kong!

 


Friends, we found out today that there will indeed be a debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris in September on ABC, and there may be other debates forthcoming.  Good!  It will be fascinating to see these two mega-geniuses clash rhetorically.  Trump clearly feels good about his chances.  Maybe he should.  The degree to which Harris's handlers have been shielding her from scrutiny, and even human contact, doesn't inspire confidence!


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy54l4x7d71o

 

I found this story most interesting: Tulsi Gabbard, dissident Democrat, has apparently been targeted by the TSA and federal air marshals as a potential terrorist.  Is this pure political payback?  Could be.  I mean, this is the same administration that denied RFK, Jr. Secret Service protection until it became politically embarrassing to do so.  Of course, they may have been doing him a favor!

 

https://www.racket.news/p/american-stasi-tulsi-gabbard-confirms 


Finally, here's an intriguing retrospective on the Watergate affair, 50 years after the resignation of Richard Nixon from the presidency.  In some ways, poor Dick Nixon was the first victim of the "Deep State" and "lawfare".  In other ways, he was his own worst enemy.  Be that as it may, I certainly agree that we should evaluate the legacy and meaning of Watergate in a balanced and objective way.  We all know that the Dems and their media allies have been trying to relive the Watergate era, and bring down the president by following the same playbook, every single time a Republican has been elected to the office.  Heck, in 2024, they may not even wait until Trump becomes president.  They may do everything in their power to invalidate democracy before the fact.  You think they already have?  You ain't seen nothin' yet, trust me!


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2024/08/08/watergate_to_the_contrary_the_system_didnt_work_151416.html

Wednesday, August 7, 2024

Ballz to the Walz!

 


Friends, do you think the title of this post is inappropriate?  Well, get used to inappropriate, because that happens to be Tim Walz's speciality!  He'll be calling Trumpers names and dispensing sexual innuendo from here to November.  But hey, good taste is overrated, and at least lefties will get some laughs, albeit at our expense.  The bottom line, as I discuss on this week's Newsmaker Show, is that Walz is unlikely to change the dynamics of the race much or add to Kam-Kam's appeal.  That's the good news.  The bad news is that the race is already a dead heat.


In addition to Walz, Brian and I talk about the evolving landscape of the Trump v. Harris campaign (which mostly involves Harris accepting the accolades of the press without ever actually talking to it), the interesting question of who is making the decisions in the Biden-Harris administration, the potential for the Democrats in Congress to veto the American people's choice of Donald Trump as the next president, the relative decline in the polling numbers for all the third party and independent candidates for president, the partisan dimensions of the debate over cryptocurrencies, and the Olympic medal count and what it suggests about national strength.


When we turn to This Day in History, Brian and I explore the "Purple Heart" decoration and its roots in American history, the Gulf War and the lessons of war, and turning of the tide in WWII in the Pacific theater.


Enjoy the Newsmaker Show while you still can!!!  No doubt Brian and I will be on the same chopping block when the neo-Marxists take over...


https://wlea.net/newsmaker-august-7-2024-dr-nick-waddy/

 

***

 

In other news, X, formerly known as Twitter, is suing everyone in sight for a "systemic illegal boycott" of the platform by advertisers.  I say: nice try!  All boycotts are "systemic", and I'm not sure why any of them would be illegal, although, as the Dems have taught us, everything is illegal, or can be, if only you try hard enough to make it so.  My guess is that X won't have much luck with pursuing this tack, and in fact I'm pessimistic about X's and Musk's ability to stand up to the withering contempt and calumny flowing freely from the leftist establishment.  Musk is a funny guy, though.  He's stuck by his guns and even moved further to the right and towards Trump in recent days, weeks, and months -- possibly because he now feels he has no friends left among progressives?  In that assumption he's probably correct.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/08/06/twitterx_files_antitrust_suit_against_advertising_groups_over_systemic_illegal_boycott.html 

Tuesday, August 6, 2024

Mostly Un-Peaceful Protests

 


Friends, the Left is absolutely consistent: it roundly condemns all illegality and violence...when it's perpetrated by right-wingers.  Such is the case, allegedly, with the riots in the U.K., which have come in response to the killing of three English schoolchildren.  Of course, the BLM riots in the U.S. dwarfed this level of unrest, and the Left barely noticed that there even were riots, and it sought to shield the rioters from prosecution, but these riots are different, by golly!  Now, I don't exactly have my finger on the pulse of British populism, but it's fairly clear that resentment has been building for some time about the wave of legal and illegal migration to the U.K., which hit record levels under a Conservative government, and will presumably accelerate under the new Labour regime.  The establishment response has been predictable: anyone who riots is racist scum, and anyone who questions the state's response to those riots, or its immigration policy, is spreading "misinformation" and must be silenced.  What else is new?  Now, we should be clear that Britain is not experiencing a "civil war", and nor is it likely to do so anytime soon, but the public unease about the migration situation will continue to be an albatross around Labour's collective neck, unless and until the number of migrants declines.  If Labour is smart, it will make that happen.


https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/08/06/multiple-travels-alerts-issued-as-world-recoils-from-starmers-britain/

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ydddy3qzgo 


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj622z0w7n0o

 

In other news, RFK, Jr.'s presidential campaign is struggling, and frankly it isn't surprising, given the blistering contempt that has been gushing in his direction from the mainstream media ever since, well, he opened his mouth about COVID, let alone decided to run against the annointed one -- who was Joe Biden, but times change, right?   Anyway, it was predictable that, as the stakes rose in the election and it became clear that no third party challenger was viable, support for the also-rans would decline.  It's a shame, because, in a cycle in which vast numbers of voters express displeasure with the candidates of the two major parties, more people ought to be considering the alternatives.  Alas, imagination is not the American voter's strong suit.  Nonetheless, the outcome in November probably will hinge on how many votes RFK, West, Stein, and Oliver can snag.  Even if those numbers aren't huge, they'll be critically important.  For now, Harris is doing a good job of corraling all the lefties and Trump haters.  That's bad news for Trump.


https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4812305-rfk-jr-dead-bear-donald-trump/

 

Finally, Kamala Harris has chosen her running mate: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.  It's a selection that isn't causing much angst among Republicans.  Minnesota is unlikely to be in play unless Trump wins handily, and Walz brings little to the table except solid experience and a penchant for earthy denunciations of "weird" ultra MAGA types like DJT and Vance.  In short, he's been telling Democrats what they want to hear, and that's enough to get him the nod.  Overall, it's a safe but uninspired choice by Kam-Kam.  It may even be a sign that she now believes she has the upper hand.  Sad to say, but she could be right.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/06/politics/tim-walz-harris-vice-president/index.html 


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cleyjp5qldno

Monday, August 5, 2024

Killing It (And By "It", We Mean Democracy)

 


Friends, Kamala Harris may not be willing to speak to a single journalist or answer a single challenging question, but that hasn't prevented her from taking the lead in national polls.  And why wouldn't she be in the lead?  She benefits from widespread TDS, and she isn't burdened by the need to be specific about her policy positions, or to explain how she "evolved" from Biden's understudy to the Democratic Party's standard-bearer overnight.  Simply put, the media lets her get away with...anything and everything.  This can't last, we assume, but for now the canonization of Kam-Kam seems to be going swimmingly.  If I were the GOP, I'd be working overtime to define Harris (negatively), and how!


https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-harris

 

https://amac.us/newsline/elections/media-lets-kamala-do-another-basement-campaign/ 


In other, and possibly highly related, news, the stock market tanked today amid market jitters centering on the health of the U.S. economy.  One day doesn't make a trend, but the Harris people have to be nervous, because anything that heightens Americans' dissatisfaction with the status quo works to her disadvantage -- to the extent that Harris is associated with any political positions whatsoever.  So far, we don't know much in that regard, except that she disavows all her previous views, doesn't necessarily wish to be associated with the Biden-Harris administration, and loves America (at least the good parts)...


https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/05/a-global-stock-rout-is-deepening-with-investors-fleeing-to-safe-havens.html

 

Finally, kudos to the federal judge who has found that Google's search engine is, in practice, a monopoly, and that Google has been illegally buttressing that monopoly with anti-competitive chicanery.  I couldn't agree more, and anything that serves to break up the Big Tech monopolies is, in the long run, good not only for consumers but for democracy itself.  We cannot allow the woke techies to dictate the terms of public discourse.  We need, therefore, pluralism in social media and search engines, in order to ensure that the American people have access to a broad range of perspectives, and to information that the lefties would rather got swept under the rug.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0k44x6mge3o 

Sunday, August 4, 2024

To Spar, Or Not To Spar?

 


Friends, as I write this, both major party presidential candidates and campaigns are debating whether or not there will even be a debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, and, if so, when and where.  This raises the even more interesting question: which candidate would be more likely to benefit from said debate -- or is the most likely outcome a political "nothingburger"?  I don't pretend to have the answers, but a debate would be risky for both participants, and both may also believe that they currently have the upper hand, or are likely to have it by September, so, for those reasons, it's conceivable that we will remain at an impasse and no debate will ever materialize.  What's your view?


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/harris-dismisses-trump-s-fox-news-debate-plan-says-abc-still-on/ar-AA1o9KwN

 

In other news, a whole bunch of Facebook money is about to be channeled into the 2024 election, but with an important twist: whereas before, in 2020, the vast majority of the money went to boost turnout in blue areas in swing states (eek!), this time only "rural" and "nonmetro" areas will be eligible, and primarily the funds will be disbursed in non-battleground states.  Interesting!  You could make the argument, therefore, that, because Republican voters are concentrated in the countryside, this formula actually amounts to an effort to boost GOP turnout and Republican prospects in the 2024 election.  It certainly won't help at all to maximize the number of votes that the Dems can bank in their urban strongholds.  So, therefore, is Mark Zuckerberg hedging his bets, and maybe even assuming a Trump/GOP victory in 2024 -- one for which, he, Zuckerberg, plans to take partial credit?  It could be...


https://thefederalist.com/2024/08/02/here-we-go-again-zuckbucks-group-announces-plans-to-dump-more-cash-into-election-offices/

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Shifting Sands

 


Friends, if you're like me, you're getting worried about Kamala Harris's improved poll position, vis-a-vis Joe Biden.  Fair enough, but it's important to understand what's happening here.  If you dig deep in the numbers, DJT's poll numbers haven't gone down.  Instead, what we're seeing is that many Democrats and Democrat-leaning voters, who weren't prepared to vote for Sleepy Joe, are prepared -- for now -- to vote for Kam-Kam.  Quite a few of these voters were telling pollsters they would cast their ballots for Kennedy, West, or Stein.  In the past few days, these candidates' numbers have tanked.  Why?  Because Kamala isn't yet damaged goods, at least not in the same way that Joe Biden was.  People who don't like Trump can easily say, at this stage, "Sure, I'll vote for Kamala", because she's been subjected no real scrutiny, and the GOP hate machine hasn't been recalibrated to target her effectively.  Give it time.  The number one job of Republicans at this stage is to tell the American people about Harris and her record.  Once her brand is tarnished, the polls should return to where they were before, more or less.  Just you wait!


https://www.realclearpolling.com/

 

In other news, a major study confirms that most popular A.I. chatbots have a leftist bias.  No kidding!  If their designers think blue, and the major search engines curate the internet according to progressive prejudices, it could hardly be otherwise.  Anyway, it's good that we're aware of the problem, and I would hope that someone like Elon Musk is working on a partial solution.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2024/08/01/study-major-ai-chatbots-embrace-radical-leftist-political-ideologies-demonstrate-anti-conservative-bias/ 


This is an interesting story, and I ran into this buzz saw myself just days ago.  A lefty chided me for mispronouncing Kamala's name, which frankly is easy to do, because they are at least three plausible pronunciations.  In any case, I suggest you learn to say it the "right" way, because otherwise the DEI enforcers will come for you in the night...


https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210108-the-signals-we-send-when-we-get-names-wrong