Subscription

Sunday, January 30, 2022

An Even Playing Field

 


Friends, America is about a lot of things, but one of the things that defines us as a people is a passionate belief in fair play.  No one should start out with inherent advantages, right?  We should all be judged by the "content of our character" and our abilities, and let the chips fall where they may.  That's why our laws against workplace discrimination were drafted in the first place.  We were trying to ensure that every candidate for every position would be assessed as an individual, not based on their demographic profile.  

 

Needless to say, the recent decision of the Biden Administration to reserve a specific (and imminent) opening on the Supreme Court for a black female, is both un-American and -- let's just say it -- illegal and illegitimate.  Today I hope to explore the ramifications of that startling revelation.


First, I note with sadness (and more than a little disdain) that Republican Senator Lindsey Graham disagrees with my premise.  He doesn't regard a process that excludes anyone who isn't black and female as discriminatory, or even as "affirmative action".  Oh no, he says it's merely a noble effort to make the Supreme Court "look like America".  How nice!  I mean, why not have Biden's favorite black female judge dress up like the Statue of Liberty?  Then she'd look even more "like America"!  Graham prefers, incidentally, that the next Justice be a fellow South Carolinian.  As long as that's the case, he's fully satisfied.  Ugh!  It's one thing to be a RINO, folks, and it's another be a first-class idiot.  I just lost a lot of respect for Lindsey Graham.


https://www.newsmax.com/politics/lindsey-graham-supreme-court-michelle-childs/2022/01/30/id/1054660/

 

But let's start with the obvious: disqualifying people from consideration for a job -- any job -- because of their race or gender is discrimination.  It's the very definition of discrimination.  It's discrimination in its rawest and purest form.  Doing it covertly is bad enough, but doing it overtly, as the Biden Administration is in this case, is especially egregious.  Even a majority of Democrats concedes that this approach is wrong in principle.  

 

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/gender-identitypolitics-merits-scotus/2022/01/30/id/1054654/ 

 

When one makes hiring bias this obvious, however, one also makes discrimination -- for once -- easy to spot, and when it's easy to spot, it ought to be easy to...stop.  So let's consider that: is there anything that can be done about Biden's cavalier disregard for the principle of fair play, his blatant violation of employment discrimination laws, and his unconscionable race-baiting?

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jan/28/bidens-supreme-court-discrimination/ 


Perhaps!  It's time to start asking some hard questions of the Biden Administration, such as: could a federal court issue an injunction against a judicial selection process that has been publicly announced to be discriminatory?  Could Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee protest Biden's obvious and shameful bias by refusing to make a quorum and report the nomination out of committee to the whole Senate (presumably not, with Lindsey Graham around)?  Could the confirmation of a black female nominee be invalidated by the courts, or by the Supreme Court, after the fact, because of the flawed and illegal method of selection?  Could SCOTUS simply refuse to seat whomever is nominated and confirmed, because the process was illegitimate, illegal, and arguably unconstitutional?  Could President Biden be impeached, after January 2023, by a Republican House of Representatives, for his self-admitted contempt for and violation of non-discrimination laws?  Could a non-black and/or non-female candidate for nomination to SCOTUS sue the Biden Administration, after the fact, based on their (illegal) exclusion from consideration, and if so could a judgement in their favor yield monetary damages, the incarceration of the guilty parties, or even a reversal, by the courts or by the Supreme Court, of the original confirmation?  Could litigation of any of these matters delay the Senate's consideration of a Biden nominee until after January 2023, when Republicans might find themselves in the majority in the Senate, and thus able to block Biden's illegitimate pick?


These are all questions that we should be asking, and asking pointedly and urgently, lest the Biden Administration succeed in its malign efforts to balkanize the Supreme Court of the United States and turn it into a plaything of leftist ideologues and identity politics extremists.  Normally, Democrats themselves are the loudest proponents of non-discrimination laws and of the criminalization of racial and gender bias. In this case, they appear to feel entitled to practice both. Let's show them that they're wrong.

Friday, January 28, 2022

China Joe

 


Friends, the article below contains A LOT more details on the financial ties between the Biden family and Red China.  It's eye-popping stuff.  The media's complete indifference to it is remarkable too, since we all know what would happen if anyone with the last name of "Trump" was cutting deals with shady Chinese oligarchs...  But hey: no one ever said life was fair!


https://nypost.com/2022/01/27/chinese-elite-have-paid-some-31m-to-hunter-and-the-bidens/

 

Here's a terrific piece by a pal 'o mine, who rightly insists that, if the Supreme Court rules race preferences unconstitutional, academia is well positioned to circumvent that decision.  How?  They're well on their way to abolishing all objective measurements of academic merit.  By the time they're done, admissions criteria will be so fuzzy that they'll be able to admit whomever they like.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/01/28/how_universities_will_sidestep_scotus_on_affirmative_action_147107.html 


Here's a full-throated denunciation of the discriminatory move by the Biden Administration to reserve the recent opening on the Supreme Court for black females only.  It makes the case, very convincingly, that Biden's action is unprecedented, and deeply unwise.


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/biden-supreme-court-reagan-trump-jonathan-turley

 

This article lays out a path by which Senate Republicans might be able to block the advancement of a Biden nominee for SCOTUS.  It's a precarious path, and it would require a lot of gumption on the part of every Republican who sits on the Judiciary Committee.  As such, I don't like its chances of being implemented...but it might depend on the nature of the nominee Biden choses.  One thing's for sure: any GOP opposition to Biden's pick will be condemned as RACIST!!!  But what else is new?
 
 

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Non-Blacks Need Not Apply

 


Friends, today our "President" made it clear that, in his eyes, the Supreme Court of the United States is a segregated amenity.  That is, the upcoming vacancy on the high court has been designated as "for black women only".  This ought to disgust and mortify any American who believes in equal treatment and equal opportunity, needless to say.  De facto demographic tunnel vision in hiring has long been a feature of political appointments at the federal level, of course.  I remember back when President Bill Clinton chose a white woman to be his Attorney General.  Well, she went down in flames, so he picked another white woman...and she too was a dud.  So naturally he picked...another white woman: Janet Reno.  Granted, Reno was a woman only by courtesy, but Clinton clearly had decided that the Attorney General's office occupied a specific niche in his diversity portfolio, and he wasn't going to budge, come what may.  Now, President Biden has made this sort of prejudiced thinking, totally beholden to "identity politics", explicit and overt.  And shame on him for doing it!  Hopefully many Americans will be disgusted by this brazen act of employment discrimination, and they will respond accordingly: by sending the Democrats packing in November.  Unfortunately, though, it's highly likely that Biden's chosen nominee will end up on the Supreme Court.  That's beyond sad.  It's tragic.


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/591660-biden-reaffirms-pledge-to-nominate-black-woman-to-supreme-court

 

Speaking of those race-obsessed lefties, see what this indignant member of the Virginia House of Delegates had to say:

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/01/26/virginia_republican_delegate_has_had_it_with_democrats_saying_all_disagreement_is_racism_not_this_time.html 


Did you hear?  Denmark has decided, despite the omicron surge, to terminate ALL of its COVID restrictions.  Wow!  Given what happened in the U.K., this is now officially a trend.  Will it eventually reach American shores???


https://www.politico.eu/article/denmark-becomes-first-eu-country-to-scrap-all-covid-19-restrictions/

 

Finally, SNL is famously irreverent towards American Presidents, but -- and this will surprise precisely NONE of you -- it has mostly pulled its punches when it comes to current "President" Joe Biden.  Admittedly, SNL has started to make fun of Sleepy Joe a teeny tiny bit, which is progress, but its overall strategy is clear: insulate the Bozo-in-Chief as much as humanly possible from anything resembling criticism.  And you thought the point of SNL was to be "funny"?  Ha!

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/saturday-night-live-biden-first-year-in-office 

Wednesday, January 26, 2022

Perennial Battleground

 


Friends, this week's Newsmaker Show is as eye-poppingly insightful as ever!  Brian and I have a long discussion of the brewing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, its historical basis, and whether NATO and the U.S. can play any constructive role in it (don't bet on it!).  We also cover the constitutionality of Governor Hochul's mask mandates and the medium-term future of the COVID pandemic, plus the astonishing weakness of Biden and the Democrats in recent polls.  If those lefties thought they were going to ride COVID paranoia and January 6th outrage all the way to victory in November 2022, they appear to be sorely mistaken!


When we turn to This Day in History, Brian and I discuss the Franco regime in Spain, the horrific ordeal of U.S. POWs in North Vietnam, the bitter fighting in the Alsace-Lorraine region of France in the closing months of WWII, and Ukraine's (futile) declaration of independence in 1918.


All this -- and more! -- awaits you should you choose to click on the link below and let the wisdom of Waddism bathe your brain in brilliance.  Who could say no to an offer like that???


https://wlea.net/newsmaker-january-26-2022-dr-nick-waddy/


***


Here's a holistic analysis of the Dems' polling woes, which ought to set off alarm bells at DNC headquarters!


https://amac.us/democrats-nightmare-polls/

 

And here's Tucker Carlson's take on U.S. adventurism in Ukraine.  He says that only China benefits from a potential conflict between the U.S. and Russia.  He makes an excellent point (as usual)!

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/01/24/tucker_carlson_dcs_conflict_with_russia_will_only_benefit_china.html

 

Good ole President Biden doesn't appreciate it when journalists ask him hard questions.  I mean, you can see where he's coming from -- no one in the Washington press corps would have dreamed of asking the man a hardball question during the 2020 campaign...  And now, all of a sudden, these "reporters" start doing their jobs?  What the heck!

 

https://news.yahoo.com/biden-caught-hot-mic-calling-234239489.html 


And, if the Dems are tempted to declare victory over COVID and coast to electoral triumph in November, they should remember that plenty of other problems are high -- and, in this one case, higher -- on voters' list of concerns.  Inflation may well break the back of the Democratic Party in 2022.


https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2022/01/25/inflation-explodes-to-record-breaking-high-in-richmond-fed-survey/

 

One of the biggest stories of 2022 so far is the decision of Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer to retire, meaning that "President" Biden will get to name his replacement.  The Dems have already decided on the race, gender, and ideology of the appointee.  The personal details hardly seem relevant.  The bad news, of course, is that we'll be living with this judicial monstrosity for decades -- and, if Trump had prevailed in 2020, he would have gotten the opportunity to further entrench conservative domination of the judicial branch.  Talk about a missed opportunity!

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/justice-stephen-breyer-retire-supreme-court-paving-way-biden-appointment-n1288042 


Fox News ran an excellent piece last night about the immense pressure on scientists in the early stages of the pandemic to reject the lab origin theory of COVID's genesis.  Basically, it was unpalatable to point fingers at the Chicoms, so anyone who did so was lambasted as a conspiracist.  As usual, the truth was a casualty.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/01/25/bret_baier_on_covid_lab_leak_theory_there_is_only_one_narrative_that_they_want_out_there.html

 

Finally, are our Dem-run cities cesspools of atavistic violence?  You betcha!

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/murders-rose-study-2021 

Monday, January 24, 2022

WWIII?

 

Friends, speculation is building re: a potential conflict between NATO and Russia over Ukraine.  The problem?  The U.S. attempts to deter Russian aggression aren't especially credible.  Moreover, our European partners, which can exert much greater economic leverage over Russia than we can, are even less credible in their posturing than we are.  Now, I don't minimize the challenges in convincing Russia to leave Ukraine well enough alone.  Russia has a deep, abiding interest in Ukraine, and we can barely find it on a map.  Nevertheless, Mike Pompeo may have a point when he says that the foreign policy weakness of the Biden Administration has been the catalyst for the current crisis.  Where it will all lead is beyond me, but if I had to guess, I'd say: either Russia will back down, having obtained a fig leaf of a Western communiqué to justify its retreat, OR Russia will invade, and we will wag our fingers and levy some economic sanctions that won't do anything for the people of Ukraine, but may precipitate a low-grade Cold War for a decade or two.  All in all, I'd say the chances of WWIII are pretty low.


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/russia-ukraine-biden-weakness-mike-pompeo

 

https://www.newsmax.com/headline/eu-sanctions-russia-attacks/2022/01/24/id/1053713/ 


In other news, Liz Cheney is one step closer to retirement.  Hooray!


https://nypost.com/2022/01/23/trump-endorsed-candidate-beats-cheney-in-wyoming/

 

And, lest we forget, inflation is still shaping up to be the premier issue in the midterm elections:

 

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/red-hot-inflation-grips-pockets-of-u-s-midwest-and-south-with-rates-over-9-1.1712246 


We had some very good news today: SCOTUS has agreed to consider the constitutionality of race preferences in college admissions.  My hope would be that the Justices will take this opportunity to slap down racial discrimination once and for all.  And make no mistake: anti-white, anti-Asian discrimination is rampant throughout the U.S. economy, even if it's usually covert.


https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/supreme-court-affirmative-action/2022/01/24/id/1053691/

 

Finally, I don't know if this report is true, but, if even parts of it are true, it's a scandal that, had it manifested itself in the Trump family, would have attracted 24/7 media coverage and gasps of outrage galore.  It's good to be a Biden, apparently!


https://neonnettle.com/news/18102-biden-family-took-31-million-from-highest-levels-of-chinese-intelligence-

Saturday, January 22, 2022

The Beginning of the End?

 


Friends, if you read the tea leaves, and I know you do, there are some signs that the medical and scientific establishment, which is naturally closely connected to the political, cultural, and economic establishment, is preparing to mount a strategic retreat from COVID hysteria.  Not only is the omicron variant milder and seemingly in retreat, but there's a growing realization that the powers-that-be have milked the pandemic for all it has to offer them, in terms of power, wealth, and moral suasion.  Resistance to pandemic mitigation measures, in other words, is getting stronger by the day, and no longer can "our betters" depend on our coronavirus anxieties to keep us in line.  What does that mean, in practical terms?  It means that it might be time -- high time, some would say -- for the global elite to declare victory over COVID-19, and to allow all of us to get on with our lives.  This does not mean, of course, that they will give up trying to manipulate and control us.  It just means that their methodology will change.  I, for one, look forward with bated breath to the next chapter in the establishment's ceaseless campaign of subterfuge and coercion.  I also quite look forward to shedding my mask, filing away my vaccination card, and taking a bite out of life!  Will the know-it-alls who've been hounding us about social distancing, masking, vaccination, and the like claim credit for our (entirely accidental) victory over the coronavirus?  Probably.  That's to be expected.  They always claim credit, and they never admit fault.  The important thing, though, is that, at least for a while, a few of our liberties will be returned to us.  What a treat!


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00100-3/fulltext

 

In other news, Sarah Palin's libel lawsuit against the New York Times is going to trial.  I wish her all the best!  Legal pressure on the MSM may be one of our only hopes of ever compelling them to desist from bald-faced lying, since it's a sure bet that their moral and professional "standards", such as they are, won't help us much.


https://www.newsmax.com/us/libel-defamation-actual-malice-the-new-york-times/2022/01/22/id/1053535/

 

Poor Kyrsten Sinema has been formally censured by Arizona Democrats.  This won't come as a surprise to her.  Presumably she's playing the long game, assuming that, by the time she runs for reelection in 2024, lefties will have forgotten all about these so-called "voting rights bills" and will care about only one thing: defeating the Republican candidate for president.  In that assumption, she may well be proven right.

 

https://www.newsmax.com/us/kyrsten-sinema-filibuster-democrats-funding/2022/01/22/id/1053519/ 


Good ole Devin Nunes is spoiling for a fight with Big Tech over the future of free speech online.  Well, so am I, and so are you, I'd wager.  It's a little unclear when exactly Trump's social media platform will launch in earnest, but, as Nunes says, it's more important to get it right than it is to get it done fast.  We need a genuine alternative to the digital dictatorship of Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, Bill Gates, Mike Bloomberg, and their ilk.  Let's hope Trump can make it happen.


https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/devin-nunes-trump-social-media-big-tech-twitter/2022/01/21/id/1053500/

Thursday, January 20, 2022

America's Photo Finish

 


Friends, my latest article discusses in stark terms just how close America came to forsaking pluralistic, multiparty democracy in 2020-22.  It isn't because of the inveterate "fascism" of Donald Trump, either.  It's because of the electoral success of Democrats, and the determination of Democrats to refashion the ground rules of democracy to their (permanent) advantage.  The recently defeated election takeover bills were just one arrow in their quiver.  So, yes, we've held the barbarians at the gates.  That's the good news.  The bad news is that they're still swarming the ramparts, and sooner or later they may well get the chance to wreck our democracy once and for all.  Beating them decisively in 2022 and 2024 gives us our best, and possibly our only, hope of avoiding that miserable fate.


Read all about it at World Net Daily!


A Narrow Escape


Conservatives are celebrating the defeat of the Democrats' “voting rights” bills on Capitol Hill. They ought to, since these bills were a brazen attempt to federalize election administration, in clear violation of the Constitution, which gives power over elections to the states, and they would have watered down election integrity safeguards to a level that most genuine democracies would find laughable – or alarming. We can thank our lucky stars that Democratic Senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin stood up to a storm of abuse from members of their own party and did what they felt was right for our nation. As a result, the filibuster, and our electoral norms, live on, even if both grow more shopworn by the day.

Our celebration of this victory, however, should be tempered by a realization of how close we came to a mammoth defeat. Sinema and Manchin's votes were only determinative of the outcome because the Democrats failed to win an outright majority in the Senate in 2020. Instead, Democrats and Republicans both have 50 votes in the chamber.

Imagine instead that Democrats had “won” in 2020 by the sort of margins that they and pollsters expected. Imagine that the Democratic majority in the House had grown instead of shrinking to next to nothing. Imagine that the Democrats could command 53, or 54, or 55 votes in the Senate. These are not unreasonable suppositions, after all. As recently as 2009, the Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate!

Had the Democrats won more robust majorities in both houses, it's a foregone conclusion that their election takeover bills would have passed – and, in fact, Democrats probably would have been emboldened to make them more ambitious, which is to say more imperious and dismissive of state authority. Only the Supreme Court would have stood between one political party and its complete domination of the rules of the game of American politics. We know that the Democrats would have rewritten those rules to make the detection and deterrence/punishment of election fraud and election law infractions virtually impossible – since, from their perspective, it's a racist myth that violations of election laws occur in the first place. Democrats would have ensured that everyone was registered to vote, and that every voter received a ballot in the mail regardless of whether they wanted one or not. And, undoubtedly, most of that veritable mountain of ballots would have found its way back to counting rooms in boards of election across the country, regardless of who filled them out, making it difficult, if not exactly impossible, for Democrats ever to lose an election again.

Had the Democrats possessed the safe majorities in the House and Senate that we talked about above, though, the transformative changes to our government would only have begun with election law reforms. Democrats want to add additional states to the Union – all of them, needless to say, reliably blue – giving them permanent, guaranteed control of the Senate. Democrats want to ramp up federal gun control laws, imperiling our Second Amendment rights. Democrats want to expand government intervention in health care to the point where the distinction between a public and private system – between socialized medicine and free market medical care – becomes largely academic. Democrats want to use the FCC, woke social media companies, and speech codes on college campuses to censor and silence conservatives. Democrats want to unseat members of the opposition party in the House and Senate and exclude them from running ever again in federal elections. Worst of all, Democrats in increasing numbers favor packing the Supreme Court to ensure that a majority of Justices will blindly support whatever further authoritarian measures progressives deem expedient. That would eliminate any check on the ability of Democrats and liberals to impose their will on the American people.

All of these horrors, which, in sum, really would amount to the extinguishing of American democracy, could easily have come to pass – if only Democrats had been a little more successful in the 2020 elections than they were. In other words, in 2020, we survived the effective end of competitive, multiparty, pluralistic democracy by the slimmest of margins...but not for the reason that the partisan January 6th Committee claims.

Conservatives should celebrate our historic victory over Democratic schemes to manipulate our elections, therefore. But we should also be thoroughly chastened and downright horrified by the fact that the opposing party has warmly embraced two very dangerous ideas: one, that the GOP has lost all legitimacy and is a racist, sexist, fascist cabal, “a dagger at the throat of America”; and, two, that the overturning of virtually any past democratic norm and/or constitutional principle is justified in order to prevent Republicans from retaking power.

It doesn't take a genius to intuit where such views can lead: to tyranny and oppression. And they will lead us there, and in record time, unless the Democratic Party is defeated in 2022 and 2024. With any luck, those defeats would force Democrats to rethink their extremism and their betrayal of American and Western political traditions, and to return to some version of democratic normalcy.

Think of it this way: just a few years ago, Republicans controlled the House, the Senate, the presidency, and the courts, including the Supreme Court. Despite possessing that kind of sweeping power, they never seriously considered radically transforming the ground rules of our democracy. They supported the filibuster, even though it inconvenienced them, and they bowed respectfully to the edicts of the Supreme Court. They accepted, in short, that even a seeming monopoly over the levers of federal power does not convey unlimited authority or permanent dominion.

Now, a few years later, the Democrats show no such restraint. They are a party bent on entrenching itself in power and eliminating the opposing party as an effective political force.

That is why they must be beaten at all costs.


Dr. Nicholas L. Waddy is an Associate Professor of History at SUNY Alfred and blogs at: www.waddyisright.com. He appears on the Newsmaker Show on WLEA 1480/106.9.

 

https://www.wnd.com/2022/01/narrow-escape-senate-time/ 

 

***

 

In other news, Virginia's new Governor is attempting to redefine "diversity, equity, and inclusion", and among the changes he hopes to make is deemphasizing race and replacing "equity" with "opportunity".  This is a welcome change in tone, but one has to wonder whether any of the "diversity" professionals out there will take any notice.

 

https://richmond.com/youngkin-names-a-new-diversity-officer-for-the-state-orders-a-new-focus-for-the/article_fdbb1fdd-e6c9-581e-a7ad-b82e456843e8.html 


New York City is turning its back on Teddy Roosevelt.  No surprise there.  The only question is when Franklin Delano will bite the dust too!


https://www.npr.org/2022/01/20/1074394869/roosevelt-statue-removed-natural-history-museum

 

Our old friend Robert Reich is in hot water because of his fierce rhetoric targeting Senator Kyrsten Sinema.  Poor Bobby.  I just hate to see such a nice guy besmirched...

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-labor-secretary-reich-sinema-filibuster 


The lasest Trafalgar poll contains oodles of bad news for the Dems, including an almost 14-point deficit in terms of the generic ballot question.  Ouch!  Do I believe that margin will hold?  Not a chance.  Do I believe the Dems are in big, big trouble in 2022?  You better believe it!


https://amgreatness.com/2022/01/20/trafalgar-38-7-approval-rating-for-biden-voters-prefer-gop-over-dems-55-7-to-42-2/

 

Finally, natural immunity against COVID has been deprecated by Democratic politicians and the scientific/medical experts alike, because, as you may have heard, nothing matters but those precious vaccinations.  Well, now it appears that natural immunity is arguably superior to vaccination when it comes to battling the delta strain of COVID.  My guess would be that omicron is even more vaccine-resistent.  That doesn't make vaccines useless, of course, but it does limit their usefulness, and it makes our discrimination against COVID "survivors" positively absurd.

 

 https://dailycaller.com/2022/01/19/cdc-natural-immunity-outperforms-vaccination-covid-19-coronavirus/

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Take That, Lefties!

 


Friends, I just couldn't resist posting this outstanding declamation by Jordan Peterson, erstwhile Professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto.  Peterson eloquently laments the rise of intolerant wokeness, plus diversity, inclusion, and equity initiatives (to which he applies the apt acronym DIE).  He calls on professors, artists, corporate CEOs, and other people in culturally, politically, and economically influential positions to stand fast against the tide of neo-Marxism.  I defy you to read this article and not come away deeply impressed.


https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jordan-peterson-why-i-am-no-longer-a-tenured-professor-at-the-university-of-toronto

 

And there's a big story out of the U.K. today.  Prime Minister Boris Johnson is ending most COVID restrictions, because of the waning reach of the dreaded omicron.  Bravo, I say!  Britain's conservative government was, unfortunately, at the forefront of oppressive COVID mandates.  Now it's at the forefront of the restoration of liberty.  That's an improvement, needless to say.

 

https://www.newsmax.com/finance/streettalk/covid-lockdown-vaccine-masks-rules/2022/01/19/id/1053013/ 

An Excess of Enthusiasm

 


Friends, this week's Newsmaker Show is stimulating, titillating, and probably a few other things that are illegal in the state of Arkansas.  Don't let that deter you, though.  It's still permissible (and ever so gratifying) to listen in...


When Brian and I address current events this week, we focus in particular on an innocent woman caught up in the Trump-Russia hoax, and how much damage the hoaxsters caused (and how little accountability they're ever likely to face).  We also cover Rand Paul's denunciation of DirecTV, what the U.S. can do (realistically) to protect the people of Taiwan, and the Democrats' about-face on the filibuster, plus their hyperventilating about "voting rights".


When we turn to "This Day in History", Brian and I discuss Howard Dean's infamous "scream", which brought his upstart, progressively-minded presidential campaign to a screeching (pun intended) halt in 2004.  I suggest that this incident was just one more instance of the Democratic Party machine sabotaging and betraying its own left-wing base.  We also ponder the legacy of Indira Gandhi, female Prime Minister of India, plus India's rapid rise and very consequential democratization in recent years.


Can you really analyze ALL THAT in under 30 minutes?  You can!!!  And I did.  Listen in, and I'll prove it.


https://wlea.net/newsmaker-january-19-2022-dr-nick-waddy/

 

In other news, you might want to read this excellent article about the zeal and enthusiasm that lefties are mustering for the imposition of authoritarian measures targeting dissenters, i.e. us.  The blinding self-righteousness of the Left has many of us asking: what rights would these people NOT violate, in the service of their sacred cause?


https://amgreatness.com/2022/01/18/the-nazi-next-door/

 

Republican Congressman Lee Zeldin has raised a bunch of money to support his run for Governor of New York.  He'll need it, given the complexion of the state.  Here's hoping that he, or someone similarly conservative, can win an upset victory!


https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/leezeldin-newyork-governor-fundraising/2022/01/19/id/1053047/

 

Who do Democrats hate even more than Republicans?  The answer may be: Democrats who refuse to toe the line and support the entirety of the left-wing, neo-Marxist agenda.  Ergo, poor Joe Manchin is now facing a flurry of ads run against him by his fellow Democrats.  You'd think he'd start to wonder if he's in the right party...

 

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/manchin-democrat-ads-facebook/2022/01/18/id/1052834/ 

Monday, January 17, 2022

The Rich Get Richer

 


Friends, Oxfam is lamenting the fact that the ongoing pandemic has supercharged the already vast fortunes of the world's richest men, most of them American tech billionaires.  Now, normally I'm not in the least bit troubled by the success of my fellow fat cats, but in this case, given the profiteering from lockdowns and other infringements of liberty, and given the pro-Biden, anti-Trump sympathies of many of these men, I hereby join Oxfam in manning the barricades against capitalist oppression.  Down with the bourgeoisie!  Up with Marxism-Leninism!  Gimme my "equity", I say!  And make it quick.


https://neonnettle.com/news/18046-global-elites-have-doubled-their-fortunes-to-1-9-trillion-in-last-12-months

 

In other news, speculation continues about the use of the 14th Amendment to bar Donald Trump (and others) from seeking or holding federal office in the future.  One assumes that, at some stage, the federal courts will need to weigh in on this question.  The sooner they slap down these leftist fever dreams, the better!

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jan-6-panel-member-floats-14th-amendment-as-way-to-bar-trump-from-holding-office