Subscription

Thursday, June 22, 2023

What a Schiff-head!

 


Friends, the Republican House of Representatives has (narrowly) approved a censure of Adam Schiff for his deceptive remarks over several years about Trump-Russia collusion.  Well, that's nice, but what's notable about this story is how utterly unapologetic Schiff and the Democrats are.  In fact, probably the only thing this censure will do is make Schiff a stronger candidate for the U.S. Senate (he's running to replace Diane Feinstein).  So...does this move mean lying, seditious Trump-haters are finally being held accountable?  Far from it!

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/adam-schiff-censured-house-false-allegations-trump-russia-collusion 

 

Could Republican/conservative/Christian opposition to transgender ideology ultimately serve as a pretext for the seizure of their children by the state?  The answer, of course, is yes!  Parents take note.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/06/22/mom-says-state-murdered-her-child-as-california-mulls-bill-forcing-parents-to-affirm-trans-kids/ 


One of the most consequential developments in the wake of COVID has been the vast expansion in school choice programs, and we're only beginning to realize the potential inherent in this sea change.  My hope is that, by and by, the public school system will be phased out and American parents will choose for themselves how and where to educate their children.


https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2023/06/22/suddenly_school_choice_its_rapid_post-pandemic_expansion_sets_up_a_big_passfail_test_for_education_941979.html

 

The number of GOP candidates for president in 2024 keeps growing and growing!  Do these guys (and gals) know something the pollsters don't?  They seem to think that Trump is vulnerable.  Is he?  Hmm.

 

https://apnews.com/article/will-hurd-2024-republican-presidential-primary-710f6f0d4bb6cc1f5046e20ed17ef602 


Finally, check out this intentionally misleading article about immigration from the Associated Press.  The headline here is that immigration is boosting the numbers of white people in the U.S.  Well, that's only true if you count Hispanic whites as "white", which no leftist does.  What's more, the main effect of immigration, as everyone knows, is to lower the percentage of the overall population that is white, both in absolute terms and in practical terms.  The Associated Press, naturally, wants you not to notice all this, and it certainly would hold you in utter contempt if you cared.  Well, that's not entirely true.  If you're one of tens of millions of leftists who celebrate the "great replacement" of whites (even as they deny it's real), that would be just fine.


https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/immigration-census-race/2023/06/22/id/1124474/

8 comments:

  1. Dr.Waddy from Jack: Its time that we face it, realize it ,resolve ourselves to assume it from now on and act accordingly.The antiamericans, the left, are at their core (eg. Schiff) an appallingly hardened, amoral , fanatically determined cadre utterly committed to punishing and destroying
    an America they hold beyond redemption. Like the criminals they extol and protect, they are motivated solely by perceived cause and effect. Their consciences are quelled and excused by neo marxist devotion to the principles that the end justifies the means and ". . . by ANY means necessary". Its a very sobering thing to accept; we have in our polity a faction already wielding power and intent fully comparable to that exercised by the totalitarian monsters of the 20th century as they rose to dominance and quit the human race. Yes, here in the USA!And just like those in Russia, China, Korea, Cambodia, Cuba etc. ad nauseum did,we find it oh so counterintuitive, so wrenching, to reconcile ourselves to the real possibilityof the terrible fall in store for us. Shamed by being censured? How could such people be fazed by such (to them) powerful nonsense!? The sanctions they plan for our unforgiveably erring country are incalculably more decisive!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dr.Waddy from Jack: The mechanisms for the seizing of children by the state already exist (eg. Child Protective Services). The social services professions are almost certainly dominated by leftists. It may well be that within these unelected bureacracies efforts to redefine existing standards for such terrible measures to include political incorrectness are well underway.And the amoeba of overweaning administrative law bodes myriad opportunities to turn heretofore counterintuitive, culturally peripheral phenomena into mandated experiences at appallingly young ages. Parental objection to these commands or even measured criticism may well soon trigger separation of children from "unenlightened" parents. We have already seen filthy corruption of public school curricula we scorned to believe just yesterday!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dr.Waddy from Jack: The antiamericans are irredemably stone cold set on eradicating America. Sure, many of good will support them but they should consider what happened to people who soon became ehh, disenchanted with bolshevik charmers in power; much too LATE!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dr.Waddy from Jack: Glad to see you also decry Associated Press. I only recently realized how unprofessionally compromised it is and I usually just skip over it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, Jack, the Left is infinitely ruthless, and, in its current guise, it is incapable of shame or self-doubt. That's not necessarily because it's peopled by monsters, of course. On the contrary, it's peopled by decent and intelligent human beings who just happen to be completely insulated from any and all serious suggestions and indications that their worldview and prejudices could be flawed. Leftists never have to confront the contradictions in their own thinking, because their thought-masters ensure that they never find out about them!

    Jack, just as the law is only beginning to be weaponized against conservatives, I predict that Child Protective Services is a rich vein of extortionate power that the Left will, by and by, tap far more extensively. They might even reopen the nuthouses just so they can stuff the most recalcitrant "right-wingers" in them!

    Jack, the Associated Press is all in for neo-Marxism, but the disturbing thing is that even many conservative news organizations largely depend on them. Newsmax is constantly serving up articles written by the A.P. WHY??? Laziness? Naivety? I don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dr.Waddy from Jack: I agree that there are many people of good will on the left; certainly many in the 19th century intended to right the terrible wrongs which obtained then. But the French revolution gave an early warning of the tragic, perhaps inevitable rise of frantic radicals inspired by dreamy Rousseau, who turned the Enlightenment toward tyranny. Marx gave them leave to denounce ethics and to see violence as a method justified by politically approved ends informed by unlimited expectations for a future of attainable perfection.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dr Waddy from Jack: Radicals continue to compose the vanguard of the left. Tulsi Gabbard and Sen. Zell Miller knew this when they quit an increasingly radical captured dem party. Many good people, being of good will, cannot believe that the once American dem party has degenerated as it has. Monsters like Pol Pot were once in their llves recognizable members of the human race. Heck, Mao was a librarian! In power they were revealed as things crept from hell's infernal depths. Are today's antiamericans infested with similar sorts, who would in power use it for radical evil? I think so.

    ReplyDelete
  8. That may all be so, Jack, and yet the vast majority of leftists may intend nothing of the sort. I suspect most Leninists were, in their time, well-intentioned too -- not that it did anyone a bit of good after 1917...

    ReplyDelete