Subscription

Wednesday, August 20, 2025

What's That "Giant Sucking Sound"?

 


Friends, back in 1992, that "giant sucking sound" was Ross Perot's phrase to describe the loss of American jobs to Mexico, but today that slogan could be used just as aptly to refer to Democrats' extraordinary loss of registered voters in the last four years -- which has been coupled with similar remarkable gains by Republicans.  Does all this mean it's clear sailing for the GOP from here on out?  No, but the balance of power has shifted meaningfully in our favor.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/20/democrat-party-upended-voter-registration-crisis-there-seems-no-end-this/ 

 

You can see part of the reason for this shift in this video of Vice-President Vance visiting Union Station, where National Guard troops are helping to keep people safe.  Democrats, of course, are offended by safety, and by any suggestion that their administration of America's cities is less than perfect.  In other words, they're on the side of the criminals, by default!

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/c8e1jrnry5ro 

 

In other news, DNI Tulsi Gabbard has revoked more security clearances for more Deep State hacks.  That's terrific, but it's a far cry from what needs to happen: the prosecution of as many Russia hoax perpetrators as possible.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78mj2m85pno 

 

Finally, I just heard the other day that MSNBC will now be called "MSNOW", and its connection to NBC (America's worst "news" organization) will be severed.  Unfortunately, almost all of MSNOW's former "talent" will be retained, so it will continue to be a cesspool of TDS.  We have a long way to go before the MSM is purified of its inveterate anti-Republican biases!!!

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2025/08/20/msnbc-ms-now-media-liberal-bias-trump/85703170007/ 

6 comments:

  1. Dr. Waddy from Jack: The drop in Dem registration is a very encouraging trend and the Dems did demonstrate why its happening in their characteristically hate filled confrontation of VP Vance.

    The Dems do,in effect, display hostility to public safety in their fanatic resistance to law enforcement of any sort (except that which protects their darlings). That was Dem cadre out there hooting at VP Vance and SecDef Hegseth as they publicly paid their respects to some of the National Guardsmen who are already making things difficult for the previously exalted and enabled criminal class in our nation's very capitol. Their resistance says it all about why the Dems are losing support. It plainly shows them up as political extremists who would in the complete power they seek gladly force their common sense defying policies on all of us(eg. "justice" and empowerment for criminals against the law abiding). The U.S. is experiencing a cultural shift back to common sense because it has finally become convinced of the dems' capture by the totalitarian far left. So its quite natural that it is abandoning a Dem party which has disgraced itself beyond measure.

    The Dems show little sign of stemming the tide of their ever more extreme far left junta . They are pushing candidates and office holders who are very frank about their support for the Soviet style "Democratic " Socialists of America. And those Dems who have displayed some doubt about this trend, eg. Newsom and Cuomo, are plainly disingenuous in doing this. We know their records in office, which manifest adequate evidence of their far left sympathies and intentions.

    The Dems are in deep trouble and it shows much promise of getting far deeper. If we keep the heat on, we have a creditable chance of driving this once loyal party to the tawdry margins where it belongs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dr. Waddy from Jack: I dunno, why would anyone buy a sinking ship? Should MSNBC stay afloat as is it ought to be named "Mental Sclerosis - Noxious Overweening Wormwood", yes?

    My understanding is that DNI Gabbard has referred some of the principles in Russiagate to DOJ. So prosecution may well be in the works now.

    In another vindication for our President's ordeal in his time of vicious lawfare travail, one of NY state's Supreme Court Appellate Division's Departments threw out the hyperbolic $500 million penalty leveled on him at the bidding of NY's AG James (NY's very own Vishinsky, the prosecutor at the 1930's Stalinist show trials ). Comrade James bleats that DJT's unforgivable civil liability for business fraud yet remains and though she may retain a good chance of support from NY state's highest Court (the Court of Appeals) - it is NY after all - I would think her case stands little ultimate chance in Federal Court. But then , ultimate legal affirmation may never have been her purpose or her understanding; gumming up hated DJT's political viability was paramount. You know who else delights in playing our legal system thus ? Criminals who have free access to extensive law libraries in prisons.

    America, we, the common sense minority in NY are sorry for the degradation our NYC dominated electorate forces upon the country against our will. Let this case serve as a very telling example of the guaranteed consequences when Dems are given executive power. To them ( and it better be to you too or you'll be hearing from them)the law is only what they say it is ; it is their way or. . . their way. These "democrats" are antidemocratic to their very far left captured souls! President Trump has said"today its me, tomorrow its you" ( who will be thus prosecuted when you dare to resist the far left).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dr. Waddy from Jack: Recent developments affirm that crime victims cannot count on their oppressors fully serving "life "sentences". Resentencing, which in some states makes them presently or eventually eligible for parole consideration, is possible. Bleeding heart Governors like Massachusetts' Presidential aspirant Dukakis , might even give them "furloughs" outside the walls which give them a chance to track down their accusers or to commit new crime against the law abiding public. There is probably no to promise crime victims that "life" or "life without parole" is assured. But there is one irrevocable penalty.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jack, let's hope that the utter failure of Dem/leftist efforts to use lawfare to torpedo their political opponent(s) will discredit the strategy itself, and that all of us can breathe a sigh of relief at lawfare's demise. I say "let's hope" because I don't fully believe anything I just said, and I suspect that the Dems would gladly dust off lawfare at the first opportunity, and they would use it more comprehensively and brazenly than before.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dr. Waddy from Jack: The Dems would, I think, use ANY method they think will serve them. As a party they have sold their political souls to an amoral far left which can have no reason for existence unless it achieves totalitarian control. And we know from extensive historical experience that if they do succeed that their rule will be equally expeditious. They want the power to directly manage ALL aspects of our public and "private lives" according to their incidental and irrefutable whim.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dr. Waddy from Jack: The Marxists who rule and intimidate the Dem party make extensive use of Marx's excusing of their obligation to adhere to traditional moral standards. Its very convenient for them to have that freedom. Accordingly, probably NO tactic is beyond them.

    ReplyDelete