Subscription

Friday, February 4, 2022

Damned If You Do, and Damned If You Don't

 


Friends, I highly recommend this article to you.  It's by Brian Karem, formerly Playboy's Senior White House correspondent -- so you know he carries a lot of weight, morally and intellectually speaking, among Democrats and progressives.  It's what's being said in the article that counts, though, not who's saying it.  Karem argues that, by naming Joseph R. Biden as Generalissimo of the Left, progressives may have...erred!  Can you imagine???  That almost sounds like, well, criticism!  I mean, you can't bad-mouth Joe Biden, right?  He's fighting a noble battle to "restore the soul of America" and save it from Trumpian fascism.  Heck, he's the anti-Trump!  Why would any leftist call him out, therefore?  Politics, especially in a two-party democracy, is a zero-sum game.  Any harm done to Biden and the Democrats is, almost by definition, helpful to Trump and Republicans.  What gives?


The answer is that Brian Karem is this thing called a "journalist".  Journalists are supposed to tell it like it is.  They're supposed to investigate, ask questions, look under rocks and see what's crawling and squirming there.  For two years, mainstream journalists have resolutely refused to do their jobs, as we all know, when it comes to Joe Biden, the Biden family, Kamala Harris, and the Democratic Party.  They've given all Dems and progressives a pass when it comes to scrutiny and criticism.  In fact, they've even joined in the mammoth effort to suppress, censor, demean, and intimidate any one who does scrutinize or criticize Biden and his ilk.  They've done so, as Karem more or less admits, with one overriding goal in mind: the defeat of Donald Trump and the GOP.  While painfully aware that Biden and the Democrats do have flaws, they've long since decided that these minor imperfections pale in comparison to the racism, sexism, lunacy, and treason that, they say, characterize the political right.  And, if you believed everything that these people believe about Trump and Trumpers, you'd probably think and say exactly the same thing. Now, though, that Biden is the President of the United States, and the Democratic Party is -- gasp! -- the governing party, these activist journalists feel like maybe, just maybe, they should return to their professional roots and subject the Biden Administration and Congressional Democrats to a little bit of constructive criticism.  In fact, the time may even have come to ask the question that no one on the Left was allowed to ask for two long years: is Joe Biden really the best that the Democratic Party can come up with?  Is he, more to the point, the right man to lead progressives, the United States of America, and the free world?  I mean, he is an old white guy (Karem calls him "patriarchal"), which is inherently suspect.  He's also tanking in the polls, and he can barely string a sentence together at times.  Makes you think, right?


If you read Karem's article, and I hope you will, you'll notice that he spends far more time insulting Donald Trump and Republicans than he does critically analyzing the leadership of Joe Biden.  And that's to be expected.  At first, any faultfinding re: the "savior" of "America's soul" will be apologetic and tentative in nature.  Poor Brian Karem isn't quite sure if he's allowed to say anything bad about Joe Biden.  Not yet.  He's painfully aware and deeply afraid that he may be pilloried as an enemy of progressivism for doing so.  He writes: "It seems almost perverse to criticize the current president for anything, compared to the batshit craziness of those on the other side of the aisle." And yet, Karem feels that ultimately the time has come.  He thus cites some back channel communication among Democrats and leftists about Biden's, uh, foibles.  He quotes one Dem insider saying, "We don't know — when he shows up, are we going to get someone barely there, or someone who's on his game?"  Ouch!  Karem goes on to write that recently he posed a question to Biden himself, and his "answer made no sense, and he took no follow-up questions. He walked away. That's part of his problem.  Many members of the press have long complained about the lack of communication from the president".  So Biden isn't just erratic and incoherent -- he's also aloof and unaccountable, and the press really hates that, as you can imagine.  Double ouch!  Karem concludes that "The trick for us in the press corps is framing the narrative. While Biden deserves criticism, it isn't on the same level as the outright outrage leveled against the former president, who remains the driving force behind an effort to overthrow our government."  Get that?  It's okay to criticize Joe Biden, just as long as you remind your readers, viewers, and listeners that Trump is still a million times worse.  Interesting.  And yet, for conservatives, this represents real progress.  It represents a rediscovery by the press of its foremost obligation -- to seek out and expose the truth -- even if their execution of that sacred charge leaves much to be desired.  It represents, for Republicans, an opportunity, even a golden opportunity, in 2022 and beyond, when, for the first time since 2019, and arguably since 2015, the mainstream media feels like it can direct some of its belligerence, scorn, and disrespect at both parties, not just one of them.  Wow!

 

So pay close attention to articles like Brian Karem's.  They represent a sea change in the media environment, and in the framing and construction, if you will, of public opinion, that could and probably will herald major gains for Republicans in the midterm elections.  They also represent the seed of what could become, if Biden continues to lead his progressive confederates into the political wilderness, an outright rebellion against old guard, Bidenist leadership.  Karem talks about "whispers" against Biden on the Left.  Well, every campaign of vilification starts out with soft-spoken barbs, and it usually ends with vitriolic shouts.  Expect, as night follows day, that the denigration of Joe Biden will escalate steadily. And if, as most observers predict, the midterm elections turn out disastrously for Team Blue, expect calls for Biden's ouster to become a popular refrain -- with long-term consequences for Democrats and progressives that we can only guess at.

 

And, just for the record, Brian Karem started it.  He may never live it down!

 

https://www.salon.com/2022/02/03/the-whisper-campaign-against-joe-biden-wont-stop--unless-he-can-change-the-narrative/ 

 

In other news, here's a great defense of Realpolitik and spheres of influence in international affairs, which, as the author points out, we ignore at our peril!

 

https://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2022/02/03/spheres_of_influence_are_a_reality_815186.html 

 

The RNC has formally censured Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for defying the consensus of the party and the Republican caucus in the House, for endangering Americans' rights to free speech and due process, and for prizing a vendetta against Donald Trump over the national interest.  Hear hear!

 

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/rnc-censure-kinzinger-cheney/2022/02/04/id/1055555/ 

 

Michael Avenatti, once the darling of CNN and MSNBC and one of fiercest Trump critics around, is heading to jail.  And that's ironic, because he garnered fame and praise on the Left mainly by assuring anyone who would listen that DJT himself was prison-bound.  Guess he missed the mark!

 

https://nypost.com/2022/02/04/michael-avenatti-convicted-of-stealing-300k-from-stormy-daniels/ 

 

Finally, how nuts is critical race theory and the people whose brains have been addled by it?  Pretty nuts!  Here's a woke Hollywood actress apologizing for being black-ish, or, in other words, not black enough. 

 

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2022/02/04/thandiwe-newton-apologizes-to-darker-skinned-actresses-im-sorry-that-im-the-one-chosen/ 

8 comments:

  1. Nick,

    Request that in the future when you use the word Democrat, you place quotation marks around it. Likewise the word President when it is used before the name Biden. You have done both in the past, so please be consistent about it.

    The current party referred to as Democrat has nothing to do with that party as it has existed in the past. In fact, when The Clintons took over The White House in the 1990s it ceased to exist. It is certainly not the party of JFK or LBJ.

    So quit using it without quotation marks around it, please. That party is now dominated by people who should be called Socialists, with a Neo-Marxist ideology, to include things like CRT and whatnot, that even Karl Marx would probably not approve of.

    And then we have the RINO mob who shifts back in forth between a lukewarm version of conservative in order to cover their asses. Bush The Younger is certainly a perfect example of this, as was his father.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, a perfect name for the "Democrats" would be The Demolition Party. Why not? The people that run it, and the people who follow it and vote for it are destroying the country, economically, morally and just about every other way. And the most depressing thing about it, is that these people are true believers.

      Delete
  2. Dr.Waddy from Jack: The Karen article was quite an experience. "Sussurus" eh? Well well! I looked it up and he did use it fairly appropriately, unlike his hyperbolic dismissal of President Trumpand the real America further on. The hope you apparently derive from his frankness, not often found in today's obsequious MSM, is plausible and thank youfor posting this. The prospect of a Dem descent into frantic hurly burly after this year's elections raises visions of whirling centrifugal doctrinally dictated forces rending a Dem party engulfed in comical dysfunction entirely of its own making! They are still enmired in their outrage at Trump's arrogant incursion on their victory procession and its assured "fundamental transformation" of our erring nation, which now would be entering a sixth, ever totalitarian year,under HER!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ray, I certainly agree that "Democrats" are not "democrats". On the other hand, I hesitate to promise to put them always between scare quotes, because, frankly, I may wear out my " key! There's a lot of cute little pejoratives I could use to describe these people, sure, and sometimes I do call them lefties, Bolshies, and what not. The fact is, though, that the Democratic Party of JFK's day really did evolve into...THE MONSTROSITY THAT WE NOW KNOW AS "THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY"! It's the same party -- technically, legally, institutionally. It's horrifying, but true. I can call Nancy Pelosi a "Democrat", with or without scare quotes, because she is one (to the eternal shame of that once great party)! So I share your sentiments, but I can't promise to sprinkle all my remarks with quotation marks. Some things are just...understood, and my scorn for "Democrats" is one of those things.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dr.Waddy from Jack: Now what might this portend: the "susurrus" of doubt in Pino Biden; the baleful vision of Dem repudiation in Nov. which even this painfully distracted conventional Trump
    hater admits a distinct possibility? What COULD happen? Would Pino Biden do us all a favor and resign in 12/22?Probably then rump President Harris would get the idea that she can actually do the job. Who can say?She might pull it off, with the still unprincipled MSM's aid?I mean El Cid did didn't he? But she would have a tightrope to hazard, between her party's far left and a powerfully resurgent real America. And should it actually come to 2024, her, eh, minimal campaigning skills may not serve her well and her party may well expect that. Why then bring on Mayor Pete for whom there is no "there" there, to face our President Trump!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dr.Waddy from Jack: I used to refuse to contribute tothe RNC because of their obvious Rino pollution. But their condemnation of Cheney and Kinzinger gives very encouraging sign of Trump inspired resolute resistance to the American far left and its obsequious vehicle, the shamed Dem party!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dr.Waddy from Jack: Spheres of influence are a natural reality. The test of a powerful nation's exercise of this certainty (should they refrain from it, another power WILL incur) inheres in its proximity to lesser lands. The world must hope for relatively enlightened influence, like that of America but be certain that other super power nations will exercise their regional wills. Should we choose to oppose their efforts we must at least fully understand the historical and geographic factors they see!


    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, Biden is easy to hate. For lefties, though, finding a viable replacement is none too easy. I don't dismiss Kam Kam altogether as a contender. She's not as dumb or as inarticulate as many people suggest. As President, she would be armored with media adulation and lots and lots of anti-racist star power. I don't believe 2024 will be easy for our side, no matter who the Dem nominee is.

    I agree: spheres of influence are normal and natural. "Sovereignty" is wonderful, in principle, but it's all relative, and weak countries perforce enjoy less of it.

    ReplyDelete