tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8511148187940933062.post717185492686544330..comments2024-03-28T11:12:07.777-04:00Comments on Waddy Is Right: Genders Aplenty!Nicholas Waddyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14650770835328089297noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8511148187940933062.post-33889120068407557102022-01-04T09:25:58.491-05:002022-01-04T09:25:58.491-05:00Dr.Waddy from Jack: A plague upon them!Dr.Waddy from Jack: A plague upon them!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8511148187940933062.post-62334293607543759572022-01-03T22:15:08.996-05:002022-01-03T22:15:08.996-05:00Jack, are you suggesting that the only sure-fire w...Jack, are you suggesting that the only sure-fire way to destroy Marxism is to put the Marxists in charge? You may well be right!Nicholas Waddyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14650770835328089297noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8511148187940933062.post-64295935200422536192022-01-03T17:05:40.662-05:002022-01-03T17:05:40.662-05:00Dr.Waddy from Jack: Their proven record in power i...Dr.Waddy from Jack: Their proven record in power is that, oh yes they have their elites who not only "guide" the unwashed but who also make haste to make material and even voluptuary profit from their totalitarian power, while the exalted" "people" suffer the growing pains of the "perfect socialist" ehh, entity, whatsoever in which it consists at their comfortable elite's arbitrary pleasure! Oh dear Herr Marx, that pesky human nature. Too bad you did not witness the discreditation of your conviction that it was knowable through natural science and therefore equally malleable ( by Christ, oh yes, but you??!! Because you and Lenin execrated him, those tragically motivated by your ultimately proven insupportable conclusions, did incalculable evil to advance them!). But then, Herr Marx, since I am sure you would have celebrated the Jewish holocaust so how very much more evil can be presumed of you, ehh? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8511148187940933062.post-40454968939183424992022-01-01T19:43:52.824-05:002022-01-01T19:43:52.824-05:00Your question is a great one (as your questions te...Your question is a great one (as your questions tend to be)! Why DOES Marxism endure? At its core, I feel, is the assumption that anyone marginalized or less fortunate got that way because they are/were oppressed. That opens up endless possibilities for "liberating" the underlings. The problem, of course, is that the whole pardigm is simplistic and, usually, hypocritical, in that it's generally elements of the elite itself that advance Marxist schemes. There are, in short, so many holes in the theory that its stubborn persistence is a real puzzlement. I mean, why doesn't the elite favor more explicitly, transparently ELITIST ideologies? Is it because the elitists, as good modernists, actually hate themselves as much, or more than, their putative enemies? I honestly don't know, but I can't wait for the Marxist storm to pass!Nicholas Waddyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14650770835328089297noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8511148187940933062.post-64137227272074909582021-12-30T17:23:41.222-05:002021-12-30T17:23:41.222-05:00Dr. Waddy from Jack: Marx and his Leni
Dr.W...Dr. Waddy from Jack: Marx and his Leni<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Dr.Waddy from Jack: Marx's Leninist avatars advanced the principle that all "revolutionary" classes whom so ever they be, or so adjudged, had to be commanded by a small elite of scientifically proven and hence irrefutable intelligentsia ,<br />if necessary, executioners. Why, that mantle has been assumed by many sociopathic monsters to the extreme misery of hundreds of millions. Having been completely discredited in history, politics and economics, those yet, perhaps, addicted to this murderous dream, yet hold forth in gender and climate perception and policy attempted dictation!<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8511148187940933062.post-33400841862720465792021-12-30T16:50:48.963-05:002021-12-30T16:50:48.963-05:00Dr.Waddy from Jack: I meant above: " . . . th...Dr.Waddy from Jack: I meant above: " . . . that natural science which had. . . .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8511148187940933062.post-20939046446016277272021-12-30T16:41:51.737-05:002021-12-30T16:41:51.737-05:00Dr.Waddy from Jack: I wonder; is support for Marxi...Dr.Waddy from Jack: I wonder; is support for Marxism an addiction? There is certainly something in it which gets them old endorphins to bustling. Can it be Marx's assurance of relief from most past wisdom (excepting Rousseau, Kant and Hegel),its inconvenient empirical truths, its atavistic amalgamation of the same and its (gasp) diversity!? Marx argued that human affairs could be analysed and predicted using thd science which had already, by his time, generated astonishing insights! He himself, using these methods, had figured out history and its future course! Perhaps his revelations met mankind at a time seminal for such comprehensive insights! It sure did convince some,ehh,very decisive people. But it has since been definitively, indescribably catastrophically DISPROVEN in practice. So why does it endure , even unto existential threat to America itself?<br />f<br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com